Elucidating genomic gaps using phenotypic profiles

Advances in genomic sequencing provide the ability to model the metabolism of organisms from their genome annotation. The bioinformatics tools developed to deduce gene function through homology-based methods are dependent on public databases; thus, novel discoveries are not readily extrapolated from current analysis tools with a homology dependence. Multi-phenotype Assay Plates (MAPs) provide a high-throughput method to profile bacterial phenotypes by growing bacteria in various growth conditions, simultaneously. More robust and accurate computational models can be constructed by coupling MAPs with current genomic annotation methods. PMAnalyzer is an online tool that analyzes bacterial growth curves from the MAP system which are then used to optimize metabolic models during in silico growth simulations. Using Citrobacter sedlakii as a prototype, the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) tool produced a model consisting of 1,367 enzymatic reactions. After the optimization, 44 reactions were added to, or modified within, the model. The model correctly predicted the outcome on 93% of growth experiments.

[1]  Ian T. Paulsen,et al.  High-Throughput Phenotypic Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Membrane Transport Genes , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[2]  Nagasuma R. Chandra,et al.  Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[3]  B. Seal,et al.  Differential carbon source utilization by Campylobacter jejuni 11168 in response to growth temperature variation. , 2010, Journal of microbiological methods.

[4]  Jennifer L Reed,et al.  Refining metabolic models and accounting for regulatory effects. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[5]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  B. Palsson,et al.  Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Computing the functional proteome: recent progress and future prospects for genome-scale models. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[8]  J. W. Campbell,et al.  FlhD/FlhC Is a Regulator of Anaerobic Respiration and the Entner-Doudoroff Pathway through Induction of the Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Protein Aer , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism—2011 , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Naryttza N. Diaz,et al.  The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[12]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Timothy T Harkins,et al.  Microbes, metagenomes and marine mammals: enabling the next generation of scientist to enter the genomic era , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[14]  Max Z. Levine,et al.  Nitrogen Availability as an Aid in the Differentiation of Bacteria in the Coli-Aerogenes Group , 1938, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[16]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[17]  B. Wanner,et al.  Phenotype MicroArray Analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 Mutants with Deletions of All Two-Component Systems , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  Terry Hazen,et al.  Application of phenotypic microarrays to environmental microbiology. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[19]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks , 2004, Nature.

[20]  J. Monod The Growth of Bacterial Cultures , 1949 .

[21]  Shihui Yang,et al.  Phenotype MicroArray Profiling of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 , 2009, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[22]  F. Rombouts,et al.  Modeling of the Bacterial Growth Curve , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[23]  B. Bochner Innovations: New technologies to assess genotype–phenotype relationships , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  * Corresponding authors , 2006 .

[25]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Conjugate Gradient Methods , 1999 .

[26]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[27]  A. Cuevas Daniel,et al.  Phenotypic profiling data for elucidating genomic gaps , 2014 .

[28]  Enrico Tatti,et al.  Involvement of the oscA gene in the sulphur starvation response and in Cr(VI) resistance in Pseudomonas corrugata 28. , 2009, Microbiology.

[29]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale Reconstruction of Metabolic Network in Bacillus subtilis Based on High-throughput Phenotyping and Gene Essentiality Data* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  EcoCyc: A comprehensive view of Escherichia coli biology , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Culture Medium for Enterobacteria , 1974, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  Wayne L. Nicholson,et al.  Uncovering New Metabolic Capabilities of Bacillus subtilis Using Phenotype Profiling of Rifampin-Resistant rpoB Mutants , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  Marcel H Zwietering,et al.  Metabolic capacity of Bacillus cereus strains ATCC 14579 and ATCC 10987 interlinked with comparative genomics. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[34]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction , 2013, Molecular systems biology.