To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting

This paper reports results from a survey of 208 Italian faculty members, inventors of university-owned patents, on their motivation to get involved in university patenting activities, the obstacles that they faced, and their suggestions to foster the commercialization of academic knowledge through patents. Findings show that respondents get involved in patenting activities to enhance their prestige and reputation, and look for new stimuli for their research; personal earnings do not represent a main incentive. University-level patent regulations reduce the obstacles perceived by inventors, as far as they signal universities’ commitment to legitimate patenting activities. Implications for innovation policies are discussed.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[2]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[3]  Y. Lee.  The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment , 2000 .

[4]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[5]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[6]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  L’attività brevettuale degli enti pubblici di ricerca in Italia ed in Europa. Rilevante? In crescita? Utile? , 2003 .

[7]  Paula E. Stephan.  Educational Implications of University–Industry Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[8]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States-A Comparison , 1999 .

[9]  Andrea Bonaccorsi.  Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia , 2003 .

[10]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[11]  Stefania Borghini,et al.  Ivory Tower vs Spanning University: il caso dell'Università di Pavia , 2003 .

[12]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[13]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[14]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium , 2003, Scientometrics.

[15]  Gary W. Matkin.  Technology Transfer and Public Policy , 1997 .

[16]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[17]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[18]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[19]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Assessing Collaborative, Pre-Competitive R&D Projects: The Case of the UK Link Scheme , 2002 .

[20]  Dianne Rahm,et al.  Academic Perceptions of University‐Firm Technology Transfer , 1994 .

[21]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[22]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[24]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[25]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[26]  Mats A. Lundqvist,et al.  Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology , 2003 .

[27]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[28]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[29]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[30]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Life Sciences Faculty , 2001 .

[31]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[32]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[33]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of University Patents after Bayh-Dole, 1980-1994 , 2006 .

[34]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation , 2004 .

[35]  Sean M. Hackett,et al.  A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research , 2004 .

[36]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden , 2007 .

[37]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[38]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  University Patenting and its Effects on Academic Research , 2003 .

[39]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications , 2004 .

[40]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[41]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? , 2001 .

[42]  Richard Ferguson,et al.  Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs— Location, Survival and Growth , 2004 .

[43]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[44]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[45]  Daniel E. Massing,et al.  AUTM Licensing Survey , 1996 .

[46]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[47]  Ricardo Z. N. Vêncio,et al.  Intellectual property and public research in biotechnology: the scientists opinion , 2003, Scientometrics.

[48]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[49]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[50]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[51]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .