Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool

This article develops a social epistemological analysis of Web-based search engines, addressing the following questions. First, what epistemic functions do search engines perform? Second, what dimensions of assessment are appropriate for the epistemic evaluation of search engines? Third, how well do current search engines perform on these? The article explains why they fulfil the role of a surrogate expert, and proposes three ways of assessing their utility as an epistemic tool—timeliness, authority prioritisation, and objectivity. “Personalisation” is a current trend in Internet-delivered services, and consists in tailoring online content to the interests of the individual user. It is argued here that personalisation threatens the objectivity of search results. Objectivity is a public good; so there is a prima facie case for government regulation of search engines.

[1]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: On bullshit , 1988 .

[2]  Alan Millar,et al.  Why Knowledge Matters , 2011 .

[3]  P. D. Laat.  How can contributors to open-source communities be trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[4]  Michael P. Lynch,et al.  True to Life: Why Truth Matters , 2004 .

[5]  C. A. J. Coady,et al.  Pathologies of Testimony , 2006 .

[6]  A. Goldman.  Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[7]  John Hyman.  THE ROAD TO LARISSA: THE ROAD TO LARISSA , 2010 .

[8]  Patrick Riley.  Rousseau's General Will , 2001 .

[9]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[10]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[11]  Lisa Jardine,et al.  The New Organon , 2008 .

[12]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Knowledge and Its Limits , 2000 .

[13]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  What computers still can't do - a critique of artificial reason , 1992 .

[14]  Deborah Tollefsen.  Wikipedia and the Epistemology of Testimony , 2009, Episteme.

[15]  David M. Estlund,et al.  Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework , 2007 .

[16]  C. List,et al.  Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem , 2001 .

[17]  Ophir Frieder,et al.  Temporal analysis of a very large topically categorized Web query log , 2007 .

[18]  Don Fallis,et al.  Introduction: The Epistemology of Mass Collaboration , 2009, Episteme.

[19]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[20]  Nick Treanor,et al.  The Measure of Knowledge , 2013 .

[21]  S. Blackburn,et al.  Truth: A Guide , 2005 .

[22]  Thomas W. Simpson.  TESTIMONY AND SINCERITY , 2012 .

[23]  M. Welbourne,et al.  The Community of Knowledge , 1986 .

[24]  Kieron O'Hara,et al.  Democracy and the Internet , 2000 .

[25]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[26]  Scott L. Feld,et al.  Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[27]  A. Goldman,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy: The Social Epistemology of Blogging , 2001 .

[28]  Don Fallis,et al.  Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  What Is Social Epistemology? a Smorgasbord of Projects , 2002 .

[30]  Don Fallis,et al.  Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia , 2008 .

[31]  Alexander Halavais,et al.  Search Engine Society , 2008 .

[32]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[33]  Thomas Kelly,et al.  Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique , 2003 .