Phases and Success Criteria of Collaboration in the Ubiquity Era

The urge to collaborate is deeply anchored in human nature. This is substantiated by evidence for different forms of group work already performed by early humans (e.g., when defending against threats). Over time, the behavior of working together, the motivation behind and the technological support have changed which also broadened the spectrum of collaborative activities. Especially today, on the brink of the ubiquity era that envisions a person to use thousands of computers everyday, new pre-conditions for co-located and remote, planned and spontaneous collaboration are manifested. Thus, previous models that distinguished between phases of collaboration such as starting, planning, executing and reporting might become less applicable. The relevance of the emergence of collaboration phase, which has been considered only marginally so far, is likely to increase drastically. This position paper discusses considerations on the nature of collaboration throughout the ubiquity era and suggests an accordingly extended phases of collaboration model.

[1]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  The spontaneous emergence of conventions: An experimental study of cultural evolution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus , 1994, Computer.

[3]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Getting to "we" , 2008, CACM.

[4]  A. Dawe Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics , 1969 .

[5]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Being Human: HCI in the Year 2020. , 2008 .

[6]  Mirjam Augstein,et al.  Collaboration Around an Interactive Tabletop in Rehabilitation Settings , 2016, Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces.

[7]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams , 1988 .

[8]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  User-centered System Design , 2011 .

[9]  Michele Nappi,et al.  FIRME: Face and Iris Recognition for Mobile Engagement , 2014, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[11]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[12]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[13]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Role-based collaboration and its kernel mechanisms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[14]  F. Heylighen Evolution, Selfishness and Cooperation , 1992 .

[15]  Drew Paine,et al.  From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW , 2015, CSCW.

[16]  Tara Matthews,et al.  Collaboration personas : A framework for understanding & designing collaborative workplace tools , 2010 .

[17]  Dawn Bikowski,et al.  Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: attention to meaning among students in wiki space , 2010 .

[18]  David L Smith,et al.  Progress and Challenges in Infectious Disease Cartography. , 2016, Trends in parasitology.

[19]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the Year 2020 , 2019 .

[20]  Erin VanLaningham,et al.  Collaboration and Community , 2014 .

[21]  Giovanni Quattrone,et al.  Analysing Volunteer Engagement in Humanitarian Mapping: Building Contributor Communities at Large Scale , 2016, CSCW.

[22]  Hervé Bourlard,et al.  Automatic Recognition of Emergent Social Roles in Small Group Interactions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[23]  J. Graham,et al.  Collaboration: A Social Work Practice Method , 1999 .