On the tangibility of letters and braille

Braille characters and letters were presented to the senses of touch and vision of sighted observers. The optical stimuli were subjected to low-pass spatial filtering to the degree that visual spatial resolution closely matched tactile spatial resolution(re the size of characters presented). In one experiment, three sets of braille characters and five sets of Roman letters, varying in typography, were presented as stimuli. The variations in tangibility and legibility across the eight character sets were highly correlated (r =.98). In a second experiment, braille characters and letters were varied in size. The psychometric functions relating tangibility and legibility to character size were similar in both shape and position along the abscissa. The congruence of tangibility and legibility for these conditions, in which the senses were matched in spatial resolution, supports the idea that braille characters are more tangible by virtue of their greater distinctiveness after the low-pass spatial filtering of cutaneous processing.

[1]  Karl Bürklen,et al.  Touch reading of the blind , 1932 .

[2]  Curt Berger,et al.  I. Stroke-width, form and horizontal spacing of numerals as determinants of the threshold of recognition. , 1944 .

[3]  R. Sleight,et al.  Accuracy of tactual discrimination of letters, numerals, and geometric forms. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Ernest Meyers,et al.  Readability of Braille as a function of three spacing variables. , 1958 .

[5]  M A TINKER.  LEGIBILITY OF PRINT FOR CHILDREN IN THE UPPER GRADES. , 1963, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  M. Tinker.  Legibility of print , 1963 .

[7]  The Fourier transform and its applications: by Ron Bracewell. 381 pages, diagrams, 6 × 9 in. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965. Price, $11.75 , 1965 .

[8]  R. Bracewell.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[9]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[10]  J. Goodman.  Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[11]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Hartwell.  Success Story , 1969, Nature.

[13]  B. Lowenfeld,et al.  Blind Children Learn to Read , 1969 .

[14]  Carson Y. Nolan,et al.  Perceptual factors in braille word recognition , 1969 .

[15]  C. Y. Nolan,et al.  Perceptual Factors in Braille Word Recognition. (American Foundation for the Blind. Research Series No. 20). , 1969 .

[16]  H. Bouma.  Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[17]  J. Kirman.  Tactile communication of speech: a review and an analysis. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  A comparison of tactile and blurred visual form perception , 1975 .

[19]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  A lateral masking effect in tactile and blurred visual letter recognition , 1976 .

[20]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[21]  G Westheimer,et al.  Spatial frequency and light-spread descriptions of visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  James C. Craig,et al.  A Confusion matrix for tactually presented letters , 1979 .

[23]  G C Gilmore,et al.  Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. R. Carlson,et al.  A large format optical display for the generation of generalized psychophysical stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[25]  C W Eriksen,et al.  The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Thomas S. Wallsten,et al.  Visual braille and print reading as a function of display field size , 1981 .