Bilateral and Unilateral Arm Training Improve Motor Function Through Differing Neuroplastic Mechanisms

Background and Purpose. This randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) versus dose-matched therapeutic exercises (DMTEs) on upper-extremity (UE) function in stroke survivors and uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine effects on cortical reorganization. Methods. A total of 111 adults with chronic UE paresis were randomized to 6 weeks (3×/week) of BATRAC or DMTE. Primary end points of UE assessments of Fugl-Meyer UE Test (FM) and modified Wolf Motor Function Test Time (WT) were performed 6 weeks prior to and at baseline, after training, and 4 months later. Pretraining and posttraining, fMRI for UE movement was evaluated in 17 BATRAC and 21 DMTE participants. Results. The improvements in UE function (BATRAC: FM Δ = 1.1 + 0.5, P = .03; WT Δ = −2.6 + 0.8, P < .00; DMTE: FM Δ = 1.9 + 0.4, P < .00; WT Δ = −1.6 + 0.7; P = .04) were comparable between groups and retained after 4 months. Satisfaction was higher after BATRAC than DMTE (P = .003). BATRAC led to significantly higher increase in activation in ipsilesional precentral, anterior cingulate and postcentral gyri, and supplementary motor area and contralesional superior frontal gyrus (P < .05). Activation change in the latter was correlated with improvement in the WMFT (P = .01). Conclusions. BATRAC is not superior to DMTE, but both rehabilitation programs durably improve motor function for individuals with chronic UE hemiparesis and with varied deficit severity. Adaptations in brain activation are greater after BATRAC than DMTE, suggesting that given similar benefits to motor function, these therapies operate through different mechanisms.

[1]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[3]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper limb movements and cerebral plasticity in post-stroke rehabilitation , 2008, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[4]  Steven L. Wolf,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[8]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Single-unit activity related to bimanual arm movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  W. Staines,et al.  Cortical adaptations and motor performance improvements associated with short-term bimanual training , 2006, Brain Research.

[11]  Dallas Johnson,et al.  Conceptualization of a New Stroke-Specific Outcome Measure: The Stroke Impact Scale , 2001, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  S. Swaney.  Measurement of Joint Motion: A guide to goniometry , 1996 .

[14]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Two Coupled Motor Recovery Protocols Are Better Than One: Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Bilateral Movements , 2002, Stroke.

[15]  Sandra B. Davis,et al.  Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Chronic Stroke: Not Always Efficacious , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  Carolee J. Winstein,et al.  Evolution of fMRI Activation in the Perilesional Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum With Rehabilitation Training-Related Motor Gains After Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  M. Toyokura,et al.  Activation of Pre–Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) and SMA Proper During Unimanual and Bimanual Complex Sequences: An Analysis Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[19]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  Upper extremity function in hemiplegia. A cross-validation study of two assessment methods. , 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

[20]  J. Whitall,et al.  Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Improves Motor Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke , 2000, Stroke.

[21]  J Whitall,et al.  Temporal and spatial control following bilateral versus unilateral training. , 2008, Human movement science.

[22]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[23]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  T. Matyas,et al.  Responses of the Densely Hemiplegic Upper Extremity to Bilateral Training , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  A. Arsenault,et al.  Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[27]  Stacy L Fritz,et al.  Minimal Detectable Change Scores for the Wolf Motor Function Test , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[29]  O. Donchin,et al.  Local field potentials related to bimanual movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Pathophysiology of Stroke Rehabilitation: The Natural Course of Clinical Recovery, Use-Dependent Plasticity and Rehabilitative Outcome , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[31]  D. Bourbonnais,et al.  Participation after stroke compared to normal aging. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Individual Factors in Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy after Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  J. Schaechter.  Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[34]  W. McKeever.  An X‐linked three allele model of hand preference and hand posture for writing , 2004, Laterality.

[35]  T Platz,et al.  Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[36]  S. Embretson,et al.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 1999, Stroke.

[37]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[39]  François Chollet,et al.  Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  J. Eng,et al.  A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Primary motor cortex is involved in bimanual coordination , 1998, Nature.

[42]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[43]  J. Whitall,et al.  Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  R. Ptak,et al.  Cortical and subcortical anatomy of chronic spatial neglect following vascular damage , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[45]  R. Tong,et al.  Bilateral Upper Limb Training With Functional Electric Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

[46]  J. Whitall,et al.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits? , 2008, NeuroRehabilitation.

[47]  H. Woldag,et al.  Change of facilitation during voluntary bilateral hand activation after stroke , 2005, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[48]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[49]  R. Nudo.  Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[50]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[51]  J. Grotta,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[52]  S. Small,et al.  Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  S. Berweck,et al.  Cortical Neuromodulation by Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Congenital Hemiparesis: An fMRI Study , 2007, Neuropediatrics.

[54]  L. Lasagna,et al.  Clinical trials and tribulations. , 1974, Archives of internal medicine.

[55]  Miao-Ju Hsu,et al.  Psychometric Comparisons of 2 Versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 Versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[56]  W. Byblow,et al.  The Contribution of Cervical Propriospinal Premotoneurons in Recovering Hemiparetic Stroke Patients , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[57]  J. Plewes,et al.  Measurement of joint motion: A guide to goniometry , 1986 .

[58]  W. Byblow,et al.  Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  M. Toyokura,et al.  Relation of bimanual coordination to activation in the sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area: Analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Brain Research Bulletin.

[60]  Paul A Thompson,et al.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[61]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Dose-Matched Control Intervention to Improve Motor Ability, Basic/Extended Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[62]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction , 2008, NeuroImage.

[63]  Lynne V. Gauthier,et al.  Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[64]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.