Sensorimotor Expectations Bias Motor Resonance during Observation of Object Lifting: The Causal Role of pSTS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have highlighted that corticospinal excitability (CSE) is increased during observation of object lifting, an effect termed ‘motor resonance’. This facilitation is driven by movement features indicative of object weight, such as object size or observed movement kinematics. Here, we investigated in 35 humans (23 females) how motor resonance is altered when the observer’s weight expectations, based on visual information, do not match the actual object weight as revealed by the observed movement kinematics. Our results highlight that motor resonance is not robustly driven by object weight but easily masked by a suppressive mechanism reflecting the correctness of the weight expectations. Subsequently, we investigated in 24 humans (14 females) whether this suppressive mechanism was driven by higher-order cortical areas. For this, we induced ‘virtual lesions’ to either the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) prior to having participants perform the task. Importantly, virtual lesion of pSTS eradicated this suppressive mechanism and restored object weight-driven motor resonance. In addition, DLPFC virtual lesion eradicated any modulation of motor resonance. This indicates that motor resonance is heavily mediated by top-down inputs from both pSTS and DLPFC. Altogether, these findings shed new light on the theorized cortical network driving motor resonance. That is, our findings highlight that motor resonance is not only driven by the putative human mirror neuron network consisting of the primary motor and premotor cortices as well as the anterior intraparietal sulcus, but also by top-down input from pSTS and DLPFC. Significance Statement Observation of object lifting activates the observer’s motor system in a weight-specific fashion: Corticospinal excitability is larger when observing lifts of heavy objects compared to light ones. Interestingly, here we demonstrate that this weight-driven modulation of corticospinal excitability is easily suppressed by the observer’s expectations about object weight and that this suppression is mediated by the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Thus, our findings show that modulation of corticospinal excitability during observed object lifting is not robust but easily altered by top-down cognitive processes. Finally, our results also indicate how cortical inputs, originating remotely from motor pathways and processing action observation, overlap with bottom-up motor resonance effects.

[1]  D. W. Joyce,et al.  Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting , 2007, Psychological research.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[4]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: time-dependent encoding of grip force in the primary motor cortex , 2012, Psychological research.

[5]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Neural Coding for Action Execution and Action Observation in the Prefrontal Cortex and Its Role in the Organization of Socially Driven Behavior , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Cortical mechanisms underlying the organization of goal-directed actions and mirror neuron-based action understanding. , 2014, Physiological reviews.

[9]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Whole-Brain Haemodynamic After-Effects of 1-Hz Magnetic Stimulation of the Posterior Superior Temporal Cortex During Action Observation , 2012, Brain Topography.

[11]  G. Hickok Do mirror neurons subserve action understanding? , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: Which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  V. Raos,et al.  The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Action Perception , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Lee A Baugh,et al.  Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  L. Amoruso,et al.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Observing object lifting errors modulates cortico-spinal excitability and improves object lifting performance , 2014, Cortex.

[20]  Marco Davare,et al.  Observation of Both Skilled and Erroneous Object Lifting Can Improve Predictive Force Scaling in the Observer , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  State-dependent TMS reveals a hierarchical representation of observed acts in the temporal, parietal, and premotor cortices. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Marzio Gerbella,et al.  The extended object-grasping network , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Iacoboni Neural mechanisms of imitation , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[26]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  I. Delvendahl,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  Emmanuele Tidoni,et al.  Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down visuomotor responses to action observation. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Marco Davare,et al.  Interactions between areas of the cortical grasping network , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  R. Johansson,et al.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Is the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Patrizia Fattori,et al.  The dorsal visual stream revisited: Stable circuits or dynamic pathways? , 2018, Cortex.

[34]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  G. Orban,et al.  Action Observation Circuits in the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Definition of DLPFC and M1 according to anatomical landmarks for navigated brain stimulation: Inter-rater reliability, accuracy, and influence of gender and age , 2013, NeuroImage.

[39]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Daniel Eastough,et al.  Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Neural Underpinnings of Gesture Discrimination in Patients with Limb Apraxia , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.