Milking Welfare: Bovis Sacer and the Inclusive Thanatopolitics of the Dairy Farm

Agricultural technologies in dairy farming facilitate increased animal productivity while simultaneously supporting appeals to animal welfare. Dairy producers operationalise these technologies to shape cows’ subjectivities to be compatible with industrial production and consumer preferences. Through this subject formation, cows are incorporated into human society as political subjects, a shift that signifies a reorientation of bovine discipline and exploitation on the farm. This emergent political subjectivity is conceptualised here in the archetype of the “bovis sacer”, an inversion of the “homo sacer” concept that describes an unkillable but sacrificial subject. We examine, primarily in Europe and North America, how welfare certification, labelling schemes, and agricultural technology in the dairy industry facilitate material and discursive changes in producer and consumer relations before exploring how these industrial transformations bring about this shift in bovine subjectivity.

[1]  L. Bava,et al.  Diffusion of precision livestock farming technologies in dairy cattle farms. , 2022, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  Rajesh Singh,et al.  Dairy 4.0: Intelligent Communication Ecosystem for the Cattle Animal Welfare with Blockchain and IoT Enabled Technologies , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[3]  A. Proctor,et al.  Living with cows, sheep and endemic disease in the North of England: Embodied care, biosocial collectivities and killability , 2022, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.

[4]  M. Henchion,et al.  Developing ‘Smart’ Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review , 2022, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[5]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  An Exploration of Current and Perspective Semen Analysis and Sperm Selection for Livestock Artificial Insemination , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[6]  P. Thomson,et al.  Automated Monitoring of Cattle Heat Stress and Its Mitigation , 2021, Frontiers in Animal Science.

[7]  Severiano R. Silva,et al.  Precision Technologies to Address Dairy Cattle Welfare: Focus on Lameness, Mastitis and Body Condition , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[8]  V. Cabrera,et al.  Integrated Decision Support Systems (IDSS) for Dairy Farming: A Discussion on How to Improve Their Sustained Adoption , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[9]  Hibba Mazhary Distancing animal death: Geographies of killing and making killable , 2021, Geography Compass.

[10]  M. Cockram Invited Review: The welfare of cull dairy cows , 2021 .

[11]  Radhika Govindrajan Labors of Love: On the Political Economies and Ethics of Bovine Politics in Himalayan India , 2021 .

[12]  M. V. von Keyserlingk,et al.  Gene Editing for Improved Animal Welfare and Production Traits in Cattle: Will This Technology Be Embraced or Rejected by the Public? , 2021, Sustainability.

[13]  R. Rawnsley,et al.  Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior. , 2021, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  B. Panikkar,et al.  Precarious Essential Work, Immigrant Dairy Farmworkers, and Occupational Health Experiences in Vermont , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  G. Berteselli,et al.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle , 2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[16]  J. Cole,et al.  Invited review: The future of selection decisions and breeding programs: What are we breeding for, and who decides? , 2021, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Caroline Lee,et al.  A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Assess the Welfare Impacts of a New Virtual Fencing Technology , 2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[18]  Paul Rodríguez,et al.  A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[19]  D. Kelton,et al.  Factors associated with the adoption of technologies by the Canadian dairy industry. , 2020, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[20]  F. Maphosa,et al.  Undocumented Migrants As Homo Sacer: Cases From Botswana and South Africa , 2020 .

[21]  M. Bionaz,et al.  Systems for evaluation of welfare on dairy farms , 2020, Journal of Dairy Research.

[22]  Francisco Maroto Molina,et al.  Welfare Quality® for dairy cows: towards a sensor-based assessment , 2020, Journal of Dairy Research.

[23]  Leah Gibbs,et al.  Animal geographies II: Killing and caring (in times of crisis) , 2020 .

[24]  K. Proudfoot,et al.  Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: The Veterinarian Perspective , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[25]  L. Brito,et al.  Incorporating temperament traits in dairy cattle breeding programs: challenges and opportunities in the phenomics era , 2020, Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture.

[26]  J. M. Lomillos,et al.  Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[27]  L. Boyle,et al.  Assessing whether dairy cow welfare is “better” in pasture-based than in confinement-based management systems , 2020, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[28]  R. Nimmo Biopolitics and Becoming in Animal-Technology Assemblages , 2019 .

[29]  A. Lawrence,et al.  What Are the Positives? Exploring Positive Welfare Indicators in a Qualitative Interview Study with Livestock Farmers , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[30]  G. Barrell An Appraisal of Methods for Measuring Welfare of Grazing Ruminants , 2019, Front. Vet. Sci..

[31]  Christopher Bear,et al.  Beyond resistance: Geographies of divergent more-than-human conduct in robotic milking , 2019, Geoforum.

[32]  T. Garnett,et al.  Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives , 2019, Ambio.

[33]  C. Tucker,et al.  Culling Decisions and Dairy Cattle Welfare During Transport to Slaughter in the United States , 2019, Front. Vet. Sci..

[34]  Jiangjin Liu,et al.  Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: a novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress — A review , 2019, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[35]  L. Delaby,et al.  Review: New considerations to refine breeding objectives of dairy cows for increasing robustness and sustainability of grass-based milk production systems. , 2018, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[36]  M. Endres,et al.  Factors associated with productivity on automatic milking system dairy farms in the Upper Midwest United States. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  R. Meadow,et al.  Are They Buying It? United States Consumers’ Changing Attitudes toward More Humanely Raised Meat, Eggs, and Dairy , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[38]  H. Buller,et al.  Food and Animal Welfare , 2018 .

[39]  J. Rushen,et al.  Impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cattle producers' reports of milking labour management, milk production and milk quality. , 2018, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[40]  D. Weary,et al.  A 100-Year Review: Animal welfare in the Journal of Dairy Science-The first 100 years. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[41]  A. Spiller,et al.  Labeling strategies to overcome the problem of niche markets for sustainable milk products: The example of pasture-raised milk. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  J. Rushen,et al.  Effect of transitioning to automatic milking systems on producers' perceptions of farm management and cow health in the Canadian dairy industry. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[43]  R. L. Doerfler,et al.  Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Dairy Cattle to the Introduction of Robot Scrapers , 2016, Front. Vet. Sci..

[44]  U. Hamm,et al.  Labels for Animal Husbandry Systems Meet Consumer Preferences: Results from a Meta-analysis of Consumer Studies , 2016 .

[45]  K. Morin Carceral Space: Prisoners and Animals: Carceral Space: Prisoners and Animals , 2016 .

[46]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Determinants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[47]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Public and farmer perceptions of dairy cattle welfare in the United States. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[48]  Tobias Linné Cows on Facebook and Instagram , 2016 .

[49]  C. Whitelaw,et al.  Genetically engineering milk , 2016, Journal of Dairy Research.

[50]  L.F.M. Heutinck,et al.  Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms , 2015 .

[51]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[52]  H. Eding,et al.  Breeding of Cows Suitable for an Automatic Milking System , 2014 .

[53]  K. Barrett,et al.  Automated feed pushers , 2014 .

[54]  James Stanescu,et al.  Beyond Biopolitics: Animal Studies, Factory Farms, and the Advent of Deading Life , 2013 .

[55]  Claire Waterton,et al.  Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with” , 2013 .

[56]  N. Olynk Assessing changing consumer preferences for livestock production processes , 2012 .

[57]  Laura Hudson A Species of Thought: Bare Life and Animal Being , 2011 .

[58]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[59]  N. Cook,et al.  Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[60]  Richard Twine,et al.  Animals as Biotechnology: Ethics, Sustainability and Critical Animal Studies , 2010 .

[61]  D. Fraser,et al.  On-farm welfare assessment for regulatory purposes: issues and possible solutions. , 2010 .

[62]  L. Holloway Subjecting Cows to Robots: Farming Technologies and the Making of Animal Subjects , 2007 .

[63]  K. Hobson Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography , 2007 .

[64]  C. Grundy‐Warr,et al.  The Irregular Migrant as Homo Sacer: Migration and Detention in Australia, Malaysia, and Thailand , 2004 .

[65]  S. Korte,et al.  Stress responses during milking; comparing conventional and automatic milking in primiparous dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[66]  R. Spelman,et al.  Utilisation of marker assisted selection in a commercial dairy cow population , 1997 .

[67]  Russell Tronstad,et al.  Cow Culling Decisions Adapted for Management with CART , 1994 .

[68]  G. Kostandini,et al.  Can Technology Compensate for a Labor Shortage? Effects of 287(g) Immigration Policies on the U.S. Dairy Industry , 2020 .

[69]  K. Gillespie The Cow with Ear Tag #1389 , 2018 .

[70]  W Steeneveld,et al.  Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[71]  Lewis Holloway,et al.  Re-capturing bovine life: Robot-cow relationships, freedom and control in dairy farming , 2014 .

[72]  Matthew Chrulew Animals in Biopolitical Theory: Between Agamben and Negri , 2012 .

[73]  R J Grant,et al.  Effects of Cow Comfort on Milk Quality, Productivity, and Behavior , 2009 .

[74]  J. Rushen Are You A Source of Stress or Comfort for Your Cows? 1 , 2000 .