The challenge of developing quality measures for breast cancer surgery.

LTHOUGH THE TREATMENT OF CANCER IS INCREASingly multimodal, virtually all patients with solid tumors undergo surgery. In breast cancer, survival after mastectomy, or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy, are equivalent, 1 and both surgical approaches have a negligible risk of major adverse events. Surgical quality performance measures for cancer have generally focused on 30-day morbidity and mortality rates for higher-risk procedures such as pancreatectomy and esophagectomy. 2 Thus, breast surgery has largely been excluded from the cancer surgical procedures for which quality measures have been developed. Indeed, the focus of quality improvement in breast cancer has primarily been on process measures tied to nonsurgical treatments, including systemic therapies and radiation. 3

[1]  H. Feigelson,et al.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[2]  M. Morrow,et al.  Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[5]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  J. Griggs,et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in quality of life after diagnosis of breast cancer , 2009, Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice.

[8]  T. Julian,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M. Morrow Margins in breast-conserving therapy: have we lost sight of the big picture? , 2008, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[10]  D. Berwick,et al.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost. , 2008, Health affairs.

[11]  A. Fagerlin,et al.  Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  Saveli Goldberg,et al.  Current Perceptions Regarding Surgical Margin Status After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Results of a Survey , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[13]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  Richard Sylvester,et al.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  T. Eberlein Perpendicular Inked Versus Tangential Shaved Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Does the Method Matter? , 2008 .

[16]  A. Luini,et al.  Conservation approaches for the management of stage I/II carcinoma of the breast: Milan Cancer Institute Trials , 2004, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  F. Vicini,et al.  Are cosmetic results following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer dependent on technique? , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.