Improvement of membrane filterability of the mixed liquor in a membrane bioreactor by ozonation

Abstract The main problem preventing the widespread use of membrane bioreactors (MBR) for wastewater treatment is membrane fouling. In this study, we proposed ozonation as a new method for controlling membrane fouling in MBR. Through a batch test, we found that membrane filterability of the mixed liquor was improved by ozonation with a dosage less than 0.7 mg/g-SS. In a further experiment, an ozonation-coupled MBR and a conventional MBR were run for over 30 days twice, which confirmed the long-term effectiveness of ozone on fouling control. Chemical oxygen demand and ammonia removals in the ozonation-coupled MBR were not affected by ozonation. From the batch test, effects of varying ozone dosages on the mixed liquor properties were measured. When the dosage was less than 0.7 mg/g-SS, extra-cellular polymeric substances were reduced, leading to a slight increase of supernatant organic concentration and more hydrophobic flocs’ surface. Moreover, the zeta-potential of colloids was simultaneously decreased. Enhanced hydrophobicity of the flocs’ surface and decreased zeta-potential of colloids provided a beneficial condition for re-flocculation among bioflocs. After the ozonated mixed liquor was aerated, the flocs re-flocculated. Floc size increased while supernatant organic concentration decreased. These were responsible for improved membrane filterability of the mixed liquor by ozonation.

[1]  C. Forster.  Bound water in sewage sludges and its relationship to sludge surfaces and sludge viscosities , 2008 .

[2]  G Amy,et al.  Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[3]  Chung-Hak Lee,et al.  Effect of Powdered Activated Carbon on the Performance of an Aerobic Membarane Bioreactor: Comparison between Cross‐Flow and Submerged Membrane Systems , 2003, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[4]  A. Grasmick,et al.  Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling , 1998 .

[5]  A. Grasmick,et al.  Influence of macromolecule adsorption during filtration of a membrane bioreactor mixed liquor suspension , 2002 .

[6]  Hong Liu,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. , 2002, Journal of biotechnology.

[7]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  A REVIEW OF SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS (SMP) IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[8]  K. Keiding,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin , 1996 .

[9]  K. Keiding,et al.  On the Stability of Activated Sludge Flocs with Implications to Dewatering , 1992 .

[10]  Xiao-yan Li,et al.  Hydrodynamics of biological aggregates of different sludge ages: an insight into the mass transport mechanisms of bioaggregates. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Jinwoo Cho,et al.  The activated sludge and microbial substances influences on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor: unstirred batch cell test , 2005 .

[12]  H. Flemming,et al.  Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs)--Part II: Technical aspects. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  H. Siegrist,et al.  Ozonation reduces sludge production and improves denitrification. , 2007, Water research.

[14]  R. Bai,et al.  Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater—the effect of system operation parameters , 2002 .

[15]  S. Derenne,et al.  Determination of structure and origin of refractory organic matter in bio-epurated wastewater via spectroscopic methods. Comparison of conventional and ozonation treatments , 2000 .

[16]  A. López,et al.  Tannery wastewater treatment by sequencing batch biofilm reactor. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Nitrification monitoring in activated sludge by oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements. , 1996 .

[18]  Jost Wingender,et al.  Community structure and co-operation in biofilms: Cohesiveness in biofilm matrix polymers , 2000 .

[19]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[20]  El Hani Bouhabila,et al.  Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors , 2001 .

[21]  Simon Judd,et al.  Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[22]  I. Chang,et al.  Effect of pump shear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water research.

[23]  K. Ahn,et al.  Operational strategies for an activated sludge process in conjunction with ozone oxidation for zero excess sludge production during winter season. , 2005, Water research.

[24]  Rui Liu,et al.  Hydrodynamic effect on sludge accumulation over membrane surfaces in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[25]  M. Sievers,et al.  Sludge treatment by ozonation--evaluation of full-scale results. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  M. Edge,et al.  Influence of ozone on styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) copolymer , 2003 .

[27]  Simon Judd,et al.  The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[28]  A. Drews,et al.  Influence of unsteady membrane bioreactor operation on EPS formation and filtration resistance , 2006 .

[29]  G. Amy,et al.  Effects of Ozone on the Colloidal Stability and Aggregation of Particles Coated with Natural Organic Matter , 1996 .

[30]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  J. Darby,et al.  Extracellular polyanions in digested sludge: Measurement and relationship to sludge dewaterability , 1997 .

[32]  H. Nagaoka,et al.  Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process , 1996 .

[33]  E. I. Vargha-Butler,et al.  Semiautomatic measurement of contact angles on cell layers by a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis , 1989 .

[34]  K. Keiding,et al.  Physico-chemical characteristics of full scale sewage sludges with implications to dewatering. , 2002, Water research.

[35]  K. Kimura,et al.  Influence of suspension viscosity and colloidal particles on permeability of membrane used in membrane bioreactor (MBR). , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  H. W. van Verseveld,et al.  Aerobic domestic waste water treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration , 1995 .

[37]  M. Cho,et al.  Potential and limitations of alum or zeolite addition to improve the performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[38]  Xia Huang,et al.  Using inorganic coagulants to control membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2006 .

[39]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors , 2003 .

[40]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .