Imagine – Scenario Development for Environmental Impact Assessment Studies

Scenario analysis is a process of evaluating possible future events through the consideration of alternative possible (though not equally likely) outcomes (scenarios). The analysis is designed to enable improved decision-making and assessment through a more complete consideration of possible outcomes and their implications. The development of strategies for water resources planning and management and the assessment of impacts of potential environmental change are often guided by analyzing multiple future scenarios within an Integrated Modeling (IM) framework, usually driven by forcing derived from global climate models and/or possible future socio-economic changes. The process of scenario development involves making explicit and/or implicit assumptions about potential future conditions, such as climate change, land cover and land use changes (e.g. urbanization), population growth, economic development, and technological change. These scenarios generally surpass forcing or behavior that has been observed in the past. Realistic assessment of scenario impacts requires complex modeling frameworks that represent environmental and socio-economic systems to the best of our knowledge, including assumptions about probabilities of the occurrence of future conditions. In addition, scenarios have to be developed in a context relevant to the stakeholders involved, to facilitate transparency of scenario results, and to establish credibility and relevance of the results among them. Hence, for the IA models to be useful for policy making, appropriate scenarios have to be carefully constructed and associated uncertainties propagated into the model outputs have to be understood and quantified. This paper is a review of the state-of-the-art of scenario development.

[1]  Martijn J. Booij,et al.  Decision making under uncertainty in a decision support system for the Red River , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  P. Tschakert,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of the Southwest's urban water sector to climate variability : case studies in Arizona , 2000 .

[3]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[4]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Can we Estimate the Likelihood of Climatic Changes at 2100? , 2002 .

[5]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[6]  Matthew G. R. Holmes,et al.  A catchment-based water resource decision-support tool for the United Kingdom , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Handling uncertainty in extreme or unrepeatable hydrological processes: the need for an alternative paradigm , 2002 .

[8]  V. Dale Applying Ecological Guidelines for Land Management to Farming in the Brazilian Amazon , 2001 .

[9]  Denis White,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FUTURES FOR THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON , 2004 .

[10]  R. Cooper,et al.  Inevitable Surprises: Thinking Ahead in a Time of Turbulence , 2003 .

[11]  M. Godet,et al.  Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios , 1996 .

[12]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin In Arizona And Sonora , 2003 .

[13]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Applying ecological principles to land-use decision making in agricultural watersheds , 2001 .

[14]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Does high forecast uncertainty preclude effective decision support? , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Ed Means,et al.  Scenario Planning: A Tool to Manage Future Water Utility Uncertainty , 2005 .

[16]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World , 1996 .

[17]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[18]  S. Schneider What is 'dangerous' climate change? , 2001, Nature.

[19]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  Alternative Futures for Monroe County, Pennsylvania: A Case Study in Applying Ecological Principles , 2001 .

[20]  Virginia H. Dale,et al.  Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management , 2001, Springer New York.

[21]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[22]  John Bolte,et al.  EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF POLICY OPTIONS ON AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES: AN ALTERNATIVE‐FUTURES APPROACH , 2004 .

[23]  Gill Ringland,et al.  Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future , 1998 .

[24]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change 2001 , 2001 .

[25]  Robert E. Linneman Shirt-Sleeve Approach to Long-Range Planning for the Smaller, Growing Corporation , 1980 .

[26]  David Hulse,et al.  Alternative Futures as an Integrative Framework for Riparian Restoration of Large Rivers , 2001 .

[27]  David G. Tarboton HYDROLOGIC SCENARIOS FOR SEVERE SUSTAINED DROUGHT IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES , 1995 .

[28]  C. Yoe,et al.  Risk and Uncertainty Analysis Procedures for the Evaluation of Environmental Outputs , 1997 .

[29]  Robert M. Argent,et al.  A modelling shell for participatory assessment and management of natural resources , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  D. Dole,et al.  FUTURE WATER ALLOCATION AND IN‐STREAM VALUES IN THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN: A BASIN‐WIDE ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[31]  David Hulse,et al.  ENVISIONING ALTERNATIVES: USING CITIZEN GUIDANCE TO MAP FUTURE LAND AND WATER USE , 2004 .

[32]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .