Choice as time allocation.

When pigeons' standing on one or the other side of a chamber was reinforced on two concurrent variable-interval schedules, the ratio of time spent on the left to time spent on the right was directly proportional to the ratio of reinforcements produced by standing on the left to reinforcements produced by standing on the right. The constant of proportionality was less than unity for all pigeons, indicating a bias toward the right side of the chamber. The biased matching relation obtained here is comparable to the matching relation obtained with concurrent reinforcement of key pecks. The present results, together with related research, suggest that the ratio of time spent in two activities equals the ratio of the "values" of the activities. The value of an activity is the product of several parameters, such as rate and amount of reinforcement, contingent on that activity.

[1]  J D Findley,et al.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  J. Staddon,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR SPACED RESPONDING AND CHOICE : A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ' , 2005 .

[4]  A J Neuringer,et al.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  T. F. Gilbert Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant. , 1958, Psychological review.

[7]  A. Catania,et al.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  G. S. Reynolds On some determinants of choice in pigeons. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  D S Blough,et al.  Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  F Mechner,et al.  Probability Relations within Response Sequences under Ratio Reinforcement. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  Bullock Dh Note on key-holding behavior in the pigeon. , 1960 .

[15]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  F Mechner,et al.  Sequential dependencies of the lengths of consecutive response runs. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.