A New Empirical Magnitude Scaling Relation for Switzerland

Abstract We estimate moment magnitudes M w for earthquakes in Switzerland recorded between 1998 and 2009 using three different spectral methods. The M w estimation in Switzerland is extended to lower magnitudes (local magnitude M L  0.1), and scaling relations between M L and M w are investigated. Above M L  4, the obtained M w estimates are consistent with the previously obtained scaling relation of M w = M L -0.3 at the Swiss Seismological Service (SED). Below M L  4, all three methods indicate that a 1:1-type relationship is inappropriate. Therefore, we propose a new piecewise empirical scaling relation for earthquakes in Switzerland. The scaling is linear below M L  2 and above M L  4. To obtain a smooth transition between the two linear scales we fit a quadratic relation in between (2≤ M L ≤4). This scaling relation is also consistent with M w estimates from moment-tensor (MT) solutions based on broadband waveform fitting of local earthquakes with M L >3.0. We have tested all three methods carefully to ensure that the observed break in scale at around M  3 cannot be attributed to bias in the M w determination. However, we cannot determine with certainty from the dataset at hand whether the break in scaling is due to bias in the routine determination of M L or to physical properties of the source.

[1]  J. Brune Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[2]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[3]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  The effect of Quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979 , 1981 .

[4]  J. Boatwright Seismic estimates of stress release , 1984 .

[5]  David M. Boore,et al.  Moment‐magnitude relations in theory and practice , 1984 .

[6]  Frank L. Vernon,et al.  Multitaper spectral analysis of high-frequency seismograms , 1987 .

[7]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5‐km depth , 1995 .

[8]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New version of the generic mapping tools , 1995 .

[9]  J. Lees,et al.  Multiple-taper spectral analysis: a stand-alone C-subroutine , 1995 .

[10]  Fabrice Bernardi,et al.  Fully Automatic Regional Moment Tensor Inversion In The European Mediterranean Region , 2004 .

[11]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Potency-magnitude scaling relations for southern California earthquakes with 1.0 , 2002 .

[12]  Donat Fäh,et al.  Earthquake Catalogue of Switzerland (ECOS) and the Related Macroseismic Database , 2003 .

[13]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty , 2005 .

[14]  G. Rogers,et al.  Moment Magnitude–Local Magnitude Calibration for Earthquakes in Western Canada , 2005 .

[15]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Homogeneous Moment-Magnitude Calibration in Switzerland , 2005 .

[16]  John Clinton,et al.  An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the Mw Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the Method , 2006 .

[17]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of earthquake source spectra in southern California , 2006 .

[18]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  Local Magnitude, a Moment Revisited , 2006 .

[19]  P. Shearer,et al.  Spatial and temporal stress drop variations in small earthquakes near Parkfield, California , 2007 .

[20]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Influence of Magnitude Range on Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction , 2007 .

[21]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Acquisition of Source, Path, and Site Effects from Microearthquake Recordings Using Q Tomography: Application to the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[22]  G. A. Prieto,et al.  A Fortran 90 library for multitaper spectrum analysis , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  Dietrich Stromeyer,et al.  The unified catalogue of earthquakes in central, northern, and northwestern Europe (CENEC)—updated and expanded to the last millennium , 2009 .

[24]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  Earthquakes Induced By the Stimulation of an Enhanced Geothermal System Below Basel (Switzerland) , 2009 .

[25]  E. Brodsky,et al.  Source Duration Scales with Magnitude Differently for Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault and on Secondary Faults in Parkfield, California , 2009 .

[26]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  A Comparative Study on Attenuation and Source-Scaling Relations in the Kanto, Tokai, and Chubu Regions of Japan, Using Data from Hi-Net and KiK-Net , 2009 .

[27]  Jochen Woessner,et al.  Earthquake detection capability of the Swiss Seismic Network , 2010 .

[28]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  Automatic computation of moment magnitudes for small earthquakes and the scaling of local to moment magnitude , 2010 .

[29]  D. Fäh,et al.  Derivation of a Reference Shear-Wave Velocity Model from Empirical Site Amplification , 2011 .

[30]  P. Martin Mai,et al.  Scaling Relations of Local Magnitude versus Moment Magnitude for Sequences of Similar Earthquakes in Switzerland , 2011 .