Water, water everywhere--except where it matters?

Biological processes depend on specific recognition between molecules with carefully tuned affinities. Because of the complexity of the problem, binding affinities cannot reliably be computed from molecular structures. Modern biophysical techniques can decompose the problem to determine the thermodynamic contributions from protein, cognate ligand and solvent. Such studies applied to a model protein with a hydrophobic binding pocket have resulted in some surprising findings. For example, binding is not driven by the favourable entropic loss of solvent water from the binding pocket, but rather by favourable dispersion interactions arising from suboptimal hydration of the protein-binding pocket. Under these circumstances, one can anticipate particularly dramatic gains in binding affinity using shape complementarity to optimise solute-solute dispersion interactions, since these will not be offset by opposing solute-solvent dispersion interactions.

[1]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Mary C. Chervenak,et al.  A Direct Measure of the Contribution of Solvent Reorganization to the Enthalpy of Binding , 1994 .

[3]  Vincenzo Mollica,et al.  Group contributions to the thermodynamic properties of non-ionic organic solutes in dilute aqueous solution , 1981 .

[4]  Dudley H. Williams,et al.  Estimating binding constants – The hydrophobic effect and cooperativity , 1999 .

[5]  R. Buttery,et al.  Volatilities of organic flavor compounds in foods , 1971 .

[6]  Min Zhou,et al.  Understanding noncovalent interactions: ligand binding energy and catalytic efficiency from ligand-induced reductions in motion within receptors and enzymes. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Structure of Water and Hydrophobic Bonding in Proteins. I. A Model for the Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Water , 1962 .

[8]  Charles Tanford,et al.  The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes , 1991 .

[9]  L. Kay,et al.  Contributions to conformational entropy arising from bond vector fluctuations measured from NMR-derived order parameters: application to protein folding. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  John Blankenship,et al.  Site–site communication in the EF-hand Ca2+-binding protein calbindin D9k , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  Henry S. Frank,et al.  Free Volume and Entropy in Condensed Systems III. Entropy in Binary Liquid Mixtures; Partial Molal Entropy in Dilute Solutions; Structure and Thermodynamics in Aqueous Electrolytes , 1945 .

[12]  Comparison of 2H and 13C NMR Relaxation Techniques for the Study of Protein Methyl Group Dynamics in Solution , 1999 .

[13]  Robert Abel,et al.  Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein–ligand binding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R E Oswald,et al.  An increase in side chain entropy facilitates effector binding: NMR characterization of the side chain methyl group dynamics in Cdc42Hs. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[15]  S. Homans,et al.  Dissecting the cholera toxin-ganglioside GM1 interaction by isothermal titration calorimetry. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Everett L. Shock,et al.  Thermodynamic functions of hydration of hydrocarbons at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Redistribution and loss of side chain entropy upon formation of a calmodulin–peptide complex , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[18]  D. Chandler.  Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Milos V. Novotny,et al.  Increased protein backbone conformational entropy upon hydrophobic ligand binding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  E. Toone,et al.  The cluster glycoside effect. , 2002, Chemical reviews.

[21]  Arthur G. Palmer,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Biopolymer Dynamics , 1996 .

[22]  A. North,et al.  Pheromone binding to two rodent urinary proteins revealed by X-ray crystallography , 1992, Nature.

[23]  Reinskje Talhout,et al.  Understanding binding affinity: a combined isothermal titration calorimetry/molecular dynamics study of the binding of a series of hydrophobically modified benzamidinium chloride inhibitors to trypsin. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  J. Dunitz.  The entropic cost of bound water in crystals and biomolecules. , 1994, Science.

[25]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Van der Waals interactions dominate ligand-protein association in a protein binding site occluded from solvent water. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  B D Sykes,et al.  Dynamics and thermodynamics of the regulatory domain of human cardiac troponin C in the apo- and calcium-saturated states. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[27]  P. Ross,et al.  Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[28]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Thermodynamic contributions of the ordered water molecule in HIV-1 protease. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  D. Mirejovsky,et al.  HEAT CAPACITIES OF SOLUTION FOR ALCOHOLS IN POLAR SOLVENTS AND THE NEW VIEW OF HYDROPHOBIC EFFECTS , 1983 .

[30]  A. Palmer,et al.  Temperature dependence of intramolecular dynamics of the basic leucine zipper of GCN4: implications for the entropy of association with DNA. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Thermodynamics of binding of 2-methoxy-3-isopropylpyrazine and 2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine to the major urinary protein. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Entropy of hydrophobic hydration: a new statistical mechanical formulation , 1992 .

[33]  Walter H.J. Ward,et al.  The entropic penalty of ordered water accounts for weaker binding of the antibiotic novobiocin to a resistant mutant of DNA gyrase: a thermodynamic and crystallographic study. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[34]  J F Brandts,et al.  Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[35]  A. Palmer,et al.  Probing molecular motion by NMR. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  Kenneth S. Pitzer,et al.  Energy Levels and Thermodynamic Functions for Molecules with Internal Rotation I. Rigid Frame with Attached Tops , 1942 .

[37]  R. Woods,et al.  Involvement of water in carbohydrate-protein binding. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  Agnieszka Bronowska,et al.  Contribution of ligand desolvation to binding thermodynamics in a ligand-protein interaction. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[39]  T. Lazaridis,et al.  Simulation Studies of the Hydration Entropy of Simple, Hydrophobic Solutes , 1994 .

[40]  Brian D. Sykes,et al.  Measurement of 2H T1 and T1.rho. Relaxation Times in Uniformly 13C-Labeled and Fractionally 2H-Labeled Proteins in Solution , 1995 .

[41]  C. Hunter,et al.  Quantifying intermolecular interactions: guidelines for the molecular recognition toolbox. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[42]  A J Wand,et al.  Insights into the local residual entropy of proteins provided by NMR relaxation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  S. Homans,et al.  Thermodynamics of binding of D-galactose and deoxy derivatives thereof to the L-arabinose-binding protein. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  L. Kay,et al.  Contributions to protein entropy and heat capacity from bond vector motions measured by NMR spin relaxation. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.