The invisible man: interpersonal goals moderate inattentional blindness to African Americans.

Research on inattentional blindness demonstrates that when attending to 1 set of stimuli, people often fail to consciously perceive a task-irrelevant object. In this experiment, we tested for selective inattentional blindness to racial outgroup members. We reasoned that some racial groups would be perceived as more relevant than others, depending on the interpersonal goal that was active. White participants were primed with interpersonal goals that ranged from psychologically distant (searching for a coworker) to psychologically close (searching for a romantic partner). In the control condition, no goal was explicitly activated. Then, participants watched a video of 2 teams passing a ball and were asked to count the ball passes of one of the teams. In the middle of the video, a Caucasian or an African American man walked through the scene. Participants were then asked to report whether they had seen the interloper. Results revealed that as interpersonal goals became closer to the self, participants were less likely to see the African American man. This research demonstrates a new form of social exclusion based on early attention processes that may perpetuate racial bias.

[1]  David K. Shipler Working Poor: Invisible in America , 2004 .

[2]  A. Baird,et al.  Attending to Threat: Race-based Patterns of Selective Attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[3]  M. Murphy,et al.  Prejudice Concerns and Race-Based Attentional Bias , 2012 .

[4]  J. Eberhardt,et al.  The role of social meaning in inattentional blindness: When the gorillas in our midst do not go unseen. , 2010 .

[5]  D. Massey American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[6]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[7]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Caryl E. Rusbult,et al.  Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. , 1989 .

[10]  H. Aarts,et al.  On the psychology of drinking: being thirsty and perceptually ready. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[11]  E. Bogardus,et al.  A social distance scale. , 1933 .

[12]  Richard P. Eibach,et al.  Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities , 2008 .

[13]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Confusing One Instrumental Other for Another: Goal Effects on Social Categorization , 2009, Psychological science.

[14]  M. Rodin Who Is Memorable to Whom: A Study of Cognitive Disregard , 1987 .

[15]  B. Mccabe An invisible man , 2000 .

[16]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. , 1996 .

[17]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation , 2008 .

[18]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[19]  Phillip Atiba Goff,et al.  Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Alvin G. Goldstein,et al.  The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. , 1996 .

[21]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Representation and Reality in the Portrayal of Blacks on Network Television News , 1994 .

[22]  M. Biernat,et al.  Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women , 2010 .

[23]  Saul L. Miller,et al.  Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Richeson,et al.  The Threat of Appearing Prejudiced and Race-Based Attentional Biases , 2008, Psychological science.

[25]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Paul G. Davies,et al.  Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Stephen R. Mitroff,et al.  The Role of Expectations in Change Detection and Attentional Capture , 2001 .

[28]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[29]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  How Meaning Shapes Seeing , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  D. Burke,et al.  Aging increases inattentional blindness to the gorilla in our midst. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[31]  Daniel J Simons Monkeying around with the gorillas in our midst: familiarity with an inattentional-blindness task does not improve the detection of unexpected events , 2010, i-Perception.

[32]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness , 2009, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[33]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .