The lack of a critical perspective in environmental management research: distortion in the scientific discourse

Although a lack of critical perspective in environmental management has been acknowledged, the frequency of this perspective has not been measured. This was noted in the editorial of Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) 1998, where Richard Welford called for more critical theory in environmental management. BSE can be seen as a forerunner in the field. Therefore, it could be expected that the most critical and reflective research contributing to sustainable development in companies could be published in the journal. In order to analyse the extent to which critical perspective is present in environmental management, we reviewed the last six years of BSE. We found that the studies undertaken generally follow the positivist paradigm, which almost exclusively echoes marginal adjustments. Papers with a critical perspective are in the minority. Using Jurgen Habermas' work on communicative action and discourse, we conclude that there is a distortion in this scientific discourse. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  Brian Higgins.  Adding business value: a strategy for identifying and patenting environment‐related inventions and avoiding patent infringement , 2003 .

[2]  Richard Welford,et al.  Editorial: Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda , 1998 .

[3]  Cathy L. Hartman,et al.  Environmental NGO–business collaboration and strategic bridging: a case analysis of the Greenpeace–Foron Alliance , 2000 .

[4]  J. Moisander,et al.  The masculine mindset of environmental management and green marketing , 2000 .

[5]  Pontus Cerin,et al.  What does the performance of the Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index tell us , 2001 .

[6]  M. Drumwright.  Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion , 1994 .

[7]  Tim Newton,et al.  Green Business: Technicist Kitsch? , 1997 .

[8]  F. Boons,et al.  Stretching the boundary: the possibilities of flexibility as an organizational capability in industrial ecology , 2001 .

[9]  R. Freeman.  The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[10]  Martin Purvis,et al.  Meeting the environmental challenge: a case of win–win or lose–win? A study of the UK baking and refrigeration industries , 2004 .

[11]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[13]  David R Jones,et al.  Leadership strategies for sustainable development: a case study of Suma Wholefoods , 2000 .

[14]  David L. Levy.  Environmental Management as Political Sustainability , 1997 .

[15]  R. E. Freeman,et al.  Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance , 1983 .

[16]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[17]  D. Springett,et al.  ‘Education for sustainability’ in the business studies curriculum: a call for a critical agenda , 2005 .

[18]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[19]  Rolf Wolff,et al.  Knowledge interests in corporate environmental management , 2001 .

[20]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  On systematically distorted communication , 1970 .

[21]  P. Cerin.  Sustainability hijacked by the sociological wall of self-evidence , 2003 .

[22]  T. Ketola.  Ten years later: where is our common future now? , 2007 .

[23]  D. Springett.  An ‘incitement to discourse’: benchmarking as a springboard to sustainable development , 2003 .

[24]  E. Galdeano-Gómez,et al.  Environmental practices and the value added of horticultural firms , 2004 .