Separating the effects of internal friction and transition state energy to explain the slow, frustrated folding of spectrin domains

The elongated three-helix bundle domains spectrin R16 and R17 fold some two to three orders of magnitude more slowly than their homologue R15. We have shown that this slow folding is due, at least in part, to roughness in the free-energy landscape of R16 and R17. We have proposed that this roughness is due to a frustrated search for the correct docking of partly preformed helices. However, this accounts for only a small part of the slowing of folding and unfolding. Five residues on the A helix of R15, when inserted together into R16 or R17, increase the folding rate constants, reduce landscape roughness, and alter the folding mechanism to one resembling R15. The effect of each of these mutations individually is investigated here. No one mutation causes the behavior seen for the five in combination. However, two mutations, E18F and K25V, significantly increase the folding and unfolding rates of both R16 and R17 but without a concomitant loss in landscape roughness. E18F has the greatest effect on the kinetics, and a Φ-value analysis of the C helix reveals that the folding mechanism is unchanged. For both E18F and K25V the removal of the charge and resultant transition state stabilization is the main origin of the faster folding. Consequently, the major cause of the unusually slow folding of R16 and R17 is the non-native burial of the two charged residues in the transition state. The slowing due to landscape roughness is only about fivefold.

[1]  Matthews Cr,et al.  Role of diffusion in the folding of the alpha subunit of tryptophan synthase from Escherichia coli. , 1990 .

[2]  C. Pace Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[3]  M Nilges,et al.  Solution structure of the spectrin repeat: a left-handed antiparallel triple-helical coiled-coil. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  A. Fersht,et al.  Conformational entropy of alanine versus glycine in protein denatured states , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[6]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Viscosity dependence of the folding kinetics of a dimeric and monomeric coiled coil. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[7]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Experimental evidence for a frustrated energy landscape in a 3-helix bundle protein family , 2009, Nature.

[8]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[9]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Evidence for sequential barriers and obligatory intermediates in apparent two-state protein folding. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  C. M. Jones,et al.  The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. , 1992, Science.

[11]  Alfonso Mondragón,et al.  Independent Movement, Dimerization and Stability of Tandem Repeats of Chicken Brain α-Spectrin , 2004 .

[12]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Apparent two-state tendamistat folding is a sequential process along a defined route. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  D. Branton,et al.  Phasing the conformational unit of spectrin. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Alfonso Mondragón,et al.  Independent movement, dimerization and stability of tandem repeats of chicken brain alpha-spectrin. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[16]  D Baker,et al.  A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein L. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  A. Fersht,et al.  Synergy between simulation and experiment in describing the energy landscape of protein folding. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Fersht,et al.  Upper limit of the time scale for diffusion and chain collapse in chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  Z. G. Szabó,et al.  Kinetic Characterization of Complex Reaction Systems , 1969 .

[20]  J. Clarke,et al.  Spectrin R16: Broad energy barrier or sequential transition states? , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  J. Danielsson,et al.  Folding without charges , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Clarke,et al.  Different Members of a Simple Three-Helix Bundle Protein Family Have Very Different Folding Rate Constants and Fold by Different Mechanisms , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Jane Clarke,et al.  The folding of spectrin domains I: wild-type domains have the same stability but very different kinetic properties. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  C. Bamford,et al.  Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics , 1976 .

[25]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  Diffusional barrier in the unfolding of a small protein. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Exploring the energy surface of protein folding by structure-reactivity relationships and engineered proteins: observation of Hammond behavior for the gross structure of the transition state and anti-Hammond behavior for structural elements for unfolding/folding of barnase. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[27]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Kinetic coupling between protein folding and prolyl isomerization. I. Theoretical models. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  William A Eaton,et al.  Measuring internal friction of an ultrafast-folding protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Pastore,et al.  The spectrin repeat folds into a three‐helix bundle in solution , 1996, FEBS letters.

[30]  Daniel Boehringer,et al.  The folding transition state of the cold shock protein is strongly polarized. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Stephen J. Moran,et al.  The folding pathway of spectrin R17 from experiment and simulation: using experimentally validated MD simulations to characterize States hinted at by experiment. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Linlin Qiu,et al.  Internal friction in the ultrafast folding of the tryptophan cage , 2004 .

[33]  Jane Clarke,et al.  The folding of spectrin domains II: phi-value analysis of R16. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  C. Matthews,et al.  Role of diffusion in the folding of the alpha subunit of tryptophan synthase from Escherichia coli. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[35]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model , 1989 .

[36]  D. Branton,et al.  Crystal structure of the repetitive segments of spectrin. , 1993, Science.

[37]  D Baker,et al.  Limited internal friction in the rate-limiting step of a two-state protein folding reaction. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  T. Schindler,et al.  Diffusion control in an elementary protein folding reaction. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Effect of Viscosity on the Kinetics of α-Helix and β-Hairpin Formation , 2001 .