The Intonation of Gapping and Coordination in Japanese: Evidence for Intonational Phrase and Utterance

In previous studies of Japanese intonational phonology, levels of prosodic constituents above the Major Phrase have not received much attention. This paper argues that at least two prosodic levels exist above the Major Phrase in Japanese. Through a detailed investigation of the intonation of gapping and coordination in Japanese, we argue that each syntactic clause projects its own Intonational Phrase, while an entire sentence constitutes one Utterance. We show that the Intonational Phrase is characterized by tonal lowering, creakiness and a pause in final position, as well as a distinctive large initial rise and pitch reset at its beginning. The Utterance defines a domain of declination, and it is signaled by an even larger initial rise, as well as a phrasal H tone at its right edge. Building on our empirical findings, we discuss several implications for the theory of intonational phonology.

[1]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Y Xu,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulated tones. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[4]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[5]  Yi Xu.  Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin , 1997 .

[6]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  A characterization of American English intonation , 1976 .

[7]  S. Kawahara,et al.  On the Proper Treatment of Non- CrispEdges , 2003 .

[8]  Masako Hirotani,et al.  Prosody and LF interpretation: Processing Japanese wh -questions , 2005 .

[9]  Mats Rooth.  On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus , 1996 .

[10]  M. Gouskova.  Deriving Economy: Syncope in Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[11]  Jeong-Seok Kim,et al.  Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis : a minimalist approach , 1997 .

[12]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[13]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[14]  Lee S. Bickmore.  Tone and stress in Lamba , 1995, Phonology.

[15]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology , 2000, Phonology.

[16]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[17]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  The Parsing of Prosody , 1996 .

[18]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[19]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[20]  Paul de Lacy,et al.  The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory , 2002, Phonology.

[21]  Jun Abe,et al.  Gapping and P-Stranding , 1997 .

[22]  A. Schafer.  Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension , 1997 .

[23]  Sónia Frota,et al.  Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English , 2005 .

[24]  W. Poser.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese , 1990 .

[25]  Haruo Kubozono.  The organization of Japanese prosody , 1987 .

[26]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[27]  Hideaki Kikuchi,et al.  X-JToBI: an extended j-toBI for spontaneous speech , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[28]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[29]  Elisabeth Selkirk.  Testing the Prosodic Structure Hypothesis (特集2 音声研究の課題(2)) , 2001 .

[30]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[31]  Takahito Shinya,et al.  The Intonational Asymmetry Between Argument and Adjunct in Japanese , 2005 .

[32]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[33]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing , 2000 .

[34]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Suzanne Curtin.  A thematic guide to optimality theory. John J. McCarthy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, Pp. 324. , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[36]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[37]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[38]  Jan P. H. van Santen,et al.  Modeling Japanese boundary pitch movements for speech synthesis , 1998, SSW.

[39]  Mark Hasegawa-Johnson,et al.  Acoustic differentiation of L- and L-L% in switchboard and radio news speech , 2006 .

[40]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production , 1981 .

[41]  S. Jun,et al.  The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy , 1998, Phonology.

[42]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Final lowering in non-final position , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[43]  Annie Rialland.  Anticipatory raising in downstep realization : evidence for preplanning in tone production , 2001 .

[44]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Upstep and embedded register levels , 2002, Phonology.

[45]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Metrical representation of pitch register , 1990 .

[46]  P. Keating.  PHONETIC ENCODING OF PROSODIC STRUCTURE , 2003 .

[47]  N. Thorsen,et al.  A study of perception of sentence intonation--evidence from Danish. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  S. Ishihara.  Intonation and interface conditions , 2003 .

[49]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Gestural overlap and recoverability: articulatory evidence from Georgian , 2001 .

[50]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  John Goldsmith,et al.  Tone and Accent, and Getting the Two Together , 1987 .

[52]  E. Grabe.  Pitch accent realization in English and German , 1998 .

[53]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese , 1984 .

[54]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[55]  Mariko Sugahara.  Downtrends and Post-FOCUS Intonation in Tokyo Japanese , 2005 .

[56]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Bengali intonational phonology , 1991 .

[57]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[58]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Phonological and Phonetic Effects of Minor Phrase Length on f0 in Japanese , 2004 .

[59]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  Intonational Analysis and Prosodic Annotation of Greek Spoken Corpora , 2005 .

[60]  Kazuaki Maeda,et al.  Phonetic investigation of boundary pitch movements in Japanese , 1998, ICSLP.

[61]  D. Ladd.  Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances , 1988 .

[62]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Syntax and Downstep in Japanese , 1991 .

[63]  D. Steriade.  Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization , 1999 .

[64]  Katharina Hartmann,et al.  The focus and prosodic structure of German Right Node Raising and Gapping , 2005 .

[65]  Daniel A. Silverman,et al.  Phasing and Recoverability , 1997 .

[66]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Evidence for soft preplanning in tonal production: initial scaling in Romance , 2006, Speech Prosody 2006.

[67]  Gjert Kristoffersen,et al.  The phonology of Norwegian , 2000 .

[68]  Mariko Sugahara,et al.  Degree of Initial Lowering in Japanese as a Reflex of Prosodic Structure Organization , 2003 .

[69]  J. McCawley.  The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese , 1968 .

[70]  Irene Vogel,et al.  The interface between phonology and other components of grammar: the case of Hungarian , 1987, Phonology.

[71]  J. Hart,et al.  Intonation by rule: a perceptual quest , 1973 .