User-made immobilities: a transitions perspective

Abstract In this paper we aim to conceptualize the role of users in creating, expanding and stabilizing the automobility system. Drawing on transition studies we offer a typology of user roles including user-producers, user-legitimators, user-intermediaries, user-citizens and user-consumers, and explore it on the historical transition to the automobile regime in the USA. We find that users play an important role during the entire transition process, but some roles are more salient than others in particular phases. Another finding is that the success of the transition depends on the stabilization of the emerging regime that will trigger upscaling in terms of the numbers of adopters. The findings are used to reflect on potential crossovers between transitions and mobilities research.

[1]  Mike Featherstone,et al.  Automobilities , 2004 .

[2]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress , 1991 .

[3]  Johan Schot,et al.  The mediated design of products, consumption and consumers in the twentieth century , 2003 .

[4]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[5]  T. Dant.  The Driver-car , 2004 .

[6]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[7]  J. Kent.  Still Feeling the Car – The Role of Comfort in Sustaining Private Car Use , 2015 .

[8]  F. Geels.  Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[9]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[10]  Igor Sádaba.  Mobilities , 2009 .

[11]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[12]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[13]  G.P.A. Mom,et al.  The Evolution of Automotive Technology: A Handbook , 2014 .

[14]  Kerry Segrave.  America on Foot: Walking And Pedestrianism in the 20th Century , 2006 .

[15]  James J. Flink,et al.  The Automobile Age. , 1989 .

[16]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[17]  Robert Wilson.  Entry and Exit , 1989 .

[18]  J. Urry,et al.  The City and the Car , 2000 .

[19]  M. Sheller.  Automotive Emotions , 2004 .

[20]  J. Urry,et al.  Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings , 2006 .

[21]  Mike Cooley,et al.  Technological change , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[22]  M. Sheller.  The new mobilities paradigm for a live sociology , 2014 .

[23]  T. Cresswell.  Towards a Politics of Mobility , 2010 .

[24]  J. Cidell.  When runways move but people don’t: The O’Hare Modernization Program and the relative immobilities of air travel , 2013 .

[25]  James J. Flink,et al.  The Automobile Age , 1988 .

[26]  K. Reese.  Accelerate, Reverse, or Find the Off Ramp? Future Automobility in the Fragmented American Imagination , 2016 .

[27]  Andrew McMeekin,et al.  Sustainability transitions and final consumption: practices and socio-technical systems , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[29]  J. Urry,et al.  The New Mobilities Paradigm , 2006 .

[30]  David Hemenway,et al.  Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City , 2011, Injury Prevention.

[31]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change , 2007 .

[32]  Joseph J. Corn.  User Unfriendly: Consumer Struggles with Personal Technologies, from Clocks and Sewing Machines to Cars and Computers , 2011 .

[33]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[34]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[35]  Peter J. Hugill,et al.  Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City by Clay McShane (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[36]  Gerhard Rosegger,et al.  Entry and exit of makes in the automobile industry, 1895–1960: An international comparison , 1987 .

[37]  J. Urry.  The ‘System’ of Automobility , 2004 .

[38]  T. Pinch,et al.  Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States , 1996, Technology and Culture.

[39]  V. Kaufmann.  Mobility as a Tool for Sociology , 2014 .

[40]  P. Norton.  Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City , 2008 .

[41]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. , 1991 .

[42]  D. C. Klein,et al.  Introduction to the Issue , 2018, Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs.

[43]  Ueli Haefeli.  GIJS MOM: Atlantic Automobilism. Emergence and Persistence of the Car, 1895-1940. Berghahn, New York 2015, 768 S. , 2016 .

[44]  Vincent Kaufmann,et al.  Motility: Mobility as capital , 2004 .

[45]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[46]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[47]  John Urry,et al.  After the Car , 2009 .

[48]  Cotten Seiler,et al.  Republic of Drivers: A Cultural History of Automobility in America , 2008 .

[49]  Johan Schot,et al.  The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems , 2016, Nature Energy.

[50]  M. Sheller,et al.  Mobility intersections: social research, social futures , 2016 .

[51]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[52]  Monika Büscher,et al.  Mobile Methods and the Empirical , 2009 .