Developing environment-specific water quality guidelines for suspended particulate matter.

It is generally well recognised that suspended particulate matter (SPM), from nano-scale particles to sand-sized sediments, can cause serious degradation of aquatic ecosystems. However, at present there is a poor understanding of the SPM conditions that water quality managers should aim to achieve in contrasting environments in order to support good ecological status. In this article, we analyse long-term SPM data collected from a wide range of reference-condition temperate environments in the UK (638 stream/river sites comprising 42 different ecosystem-types). One-way analysis of variance reveals that there is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the background SPM concentrations observed in contrasting ecosystems that are in reference condition (minimal anthropogenic disturbance). One of the 42 ecosystems studied had mean background concentrations of SPM in excess of the current European Union (EU) water quality guideline, despite being in reference condition. The implications of this finding are that the EU's current blanket water quality guideline (25 mg L(-1) for all environments) is inappropriate for this specific ecosystem-type which will be non-compliant with the guideline regardless of the intensity of land-use. The other 41 ecosystems studied had mean concentrations below the current EU water quality guideline. However, this does not necessarily mean that the guideline is appropriate for these ecosystems, as previous research has demonstrated that detrimental impacts can be experienced by some freshwater organisms, of all trophic levels, when exposed to concentrations below 25 mg L(-1). Therefore, it is suggested here that it is likely that some ecosystems, particularly those with mean concentrations in the 0.00-5.99 mg L(-1) range, require much lower guideline values in order to be effectively protected. We propose a model for predicting environment-specific water quality guidelines for SPM. In order to develop this model, the 638 reference condition sites were first classified into one of five mean background SPM ranges (0.00-5.99, 6.00-11.99, 12.00-17.99, 18.00-23.99 and >24.00 mg L(-1)). Stepwise Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) of these ranges showed that a site's SPM range can be predicted as a function of: mean annual air temperature, mean annual precipitation, mean altitude of upstream catchment, distance from source, slope to source, channel width and depth, the percentage of catchment area comprised of clay, chalk, and hard rock solid geology, and the percentage of the catchment area comprised of blown sand as the surface (drift) material. The MDA technique, with cross-validation (Wilks-Lambda 0.358, p 0.000), can predict the correct or the next closest SPM range of a site in 90% of cases. This technique can also predict SPM range membership in a probabilistic manner, allowing for an estimate of uncertainty to be made in the allocation of a site to an environment-specific SPM range.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Almo J. Cordone,et al.  THE INFLUENCES OF INORGANIC SEDIMENT ON THE AQUATIC LIFE OF 'STREAMS , 1960 .

[3]  J. Wright,et al.  An introduction to RIVPACS. , 2000 .

[4]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[5]  D. Scruton,et al.  Seasonal Effects of Suspended Sediment on the Behavior of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon , 2007 .

[6]  D. Walling The sediment delivery problem , 1983 .

[7]  J. Quinn,et al.  Effects of clay discharges on streams , 1992, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  U. Willén,et al.  European climate in the late twenty-first century: regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios , 2004 .

[9]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  A universal soil-loss equation to guide conservation farm planning. , 1960 .

[10]  J. Alabaster 1 – FINELY DIVIDED SOLIDS , 1982 .

[11]  J. Freer,et al.  Assessing catchment-scale erosion and yields of suspended solids from improved temperate grassland. , 2010, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[12]  S. Schumm,et al.  Yield of sediment in relation to mean annual precipitation , 1958 .

[13]  Jeremy S. Pal,et al.  Mean, interannual variability and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe. II: climate change scenarios (2071–2100) , 2004 .

[14]  D. Montgomery Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[16]  C. Staddon Managing Europe's Water Resources: Twenty-first Century Challenges , 2010 .

[17]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The changing character of precipitation , 2003 .

[18]  C. Brebbia,et al.  Water Pollution X , 2010 .

[19]  R. Peddicord Direct effects of suspended sediments on aquatic organisms , 1980 .

[20]  F. F. Pruski,et al.  Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: A review , 2004 .

[21]  J. R. Gray,et al.  Comparability of Suspended-Sediment Concentration and Total Suspended Solids Data , 2000 .

[22]  P. Armitage,et al.  Biological Effects of Fine Sediment in the Lotic Environment , 1997, Environmental management.

[23]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna , 1997 .

[24]  J. B. Reynolds,et al.  EFFECTS OF PLACER MINING DISCHARGE ON HEALTH AND FOOD OF ARCTIC GRAYLING1 , 1989 .

[25]  D. D. Macdonald,et al.  Effects of Suspended Sediments on Aquatic Ecosystems , 1991 .

[26]  R. Brazier,et al.  Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. , 2008, Water research.

[27]  J. S. Alabaster,et al.  Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Fish , 1982 .

[28]  Denby S. Lloyd Turbidity as a Water Quality Standard for Salmonid Habitats in Alaska , 1987 .

[29]  P. A. Ryan Environmental effects of sediment on New Zealand streams: A review , 1991 .

[30]  R. Clarke,et al.  SNIFFER WFD 119: Enhancement of the River Invertebrate Classification Tool. , 2011 .

[31]  D. Walling,et al.  Sediment yields of rivers in areas of low precipitation: a global view , 1979 .

[32]  W. Salomons,et al.  Fine‐grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues , 2005 .

[33]  N. Gray Drinking Water Quality: Problems and Solutions , 1999 .

[34]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of sediment addition on macrobenthic invertebrates in a Northern Canadian River , 1978 .