Pose Invariant Face Recognition for New Born: Machine Learning Approach

Pose is a natural and important covariate in case of newborn and face recognition across pose can troubleshoot the approaches dealing with uncooperative subjects like newborn, in which the full power of face recognition being a passive biometric technique requires to be implemented and utilized. To handle the large pose variation in newborn, we propose a pose-adaptive similarity method that uses pose-specific classifiers to deal with different combinatorial poses. A texture based face recognition method, Speed Up Robust Feature (SURF) transform, is used to compare the descriptor of testing (probe) face with given training (gallery) face descriptor. Probes executed on the face template data of newborn described here, offer comparative benefits towards affinity for pose variations and the proposed algorithm verdicts the rank 1 accuracy of 92.1 %, which demonstrates the strength of self learning even with single training face image of newborn.

[1]  Li Wei,et al.  Semi-supervised time series classification , 2006, KDD '06.

[2]  Satish K. Singh,et al.  Fusion of Ear and Soft-biometrics for Recognition of Newborn , 2012 .

[3]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Newborn Verification Using Headprint , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Res..

[4]  Krishnakumar Balasubramanian,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Generative Semi-Supervised Learning , 2010, ICML.

[5]  J. Giraldo,et al.  Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curves: empirical versus mechanistic models. , 2002, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[6]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Multimodal Database of Newborns for Biometric Recognition , 2013 .

[7]  C FIELDS,et al.  The ear of the newborn as an identification constant. , 1960, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Luciano Silva,et al.  Biometric recognition of newborns: Identification using palmprints , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[9]  Wei Jia,et al.  Newborn footprint recognition using orientation feature , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[10]  K S Shepard,et al.  Limitations of footprinting as a means of infant identification. , 1966, Pediatrics.

[11]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Intelligent Method for Face Recognition of Infant , 2012 .

[12]  William H. Edwards,et al.  Patient Misidentification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Quantification of Risk , 2006, Pediatrics.

[13]  D. Clark,et al.  Footprinting the newborn infant: not cost effective. , 1981, The Journal of pediatrics.

[14]  S. Daly,et al.  Large loop excision of the transformation zone: A histological audit , 1996 .

[15]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[16]  N. T. R. Pelá,et al.  ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DE IMPRESSÕES PLANTARES DE RECÉM-NASCIDOS , 1976 .

[17]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[19]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Can face and soft-biometric traits assist in recognition of newborn? , 2012, 2012 1st International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT).

[20]  Luciano Silva,et al.  Newborn's Biometric Identification: Can it be done? , 2008, VISAPP.

[21]  Sanjay Singh,et al.  Integrating Faces and Soft-biometrics for Newborn Recognition , 2012 .

[22]  Sanjay K Singh,et al.  Newborn's ear recognition: Can it be done? , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Image Information Processing.

[23]  Alexander Zien,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning , 2006 .

[24]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Face recognition for newborns , 2012, IET Biom..