Mixed-Initiative Control for Collaborative Countermine Operations

This paper discusses experimental results achieved by using mixed initiative robot behavior to address the challenges of detecting and marking buried metal landmines. Mission requirements pertaining to communication bandwidth and operator workload precluded conventional approaches to communication and tasking. Instead, a framework for sharing control and communicating “behavior intent” was developed to coordinate activities of intelligent unmanned air and ground vehicles. To alleviate dependence on global positioning, collaborative tasking tools were developed that use common reference points in the environment to correlate disparate internal representations (e.g. aerial imagery and ground-based occupancy grids). The behaviors allow each team member to act independently while communicating environmental features and task intent at a high level. Results show that the resulting system produced a significant decrease in task time to completion and a significant increase in detection accuracy and reliability when compared to the current military baseline. As required, the experiment was accomplished without dependence on global positioning or continuous network communication. These findings indicate that by providing an appropriate means to interleave human and robotic intent, mixed initiative behaviors can address complex and critical missions where neither teleoperated nor autonomous strategies have succeeded. Mixed-Initiative Control for Collaborative Countermine Operations David J. Bruemmer, Douglas A. Few, Curtis Nielsen, Miles C. Walton Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID 83415

[1]  David Frohlich,et al.  MIXED INITIATIVE INTERACTION , 1991 .

[2]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  The Pemex-B autonomous demining robot: perception and navigation strategies , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[3]  J.‐D. Nicoud Vehicles and robots for humanitarian demining , 1997 .

[4]  James Trevelyan Robots and landmines , 1997 .

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[6]  Y. Baudoin,et al.  Humanitarian demining and robotics , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.98CH36104).

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[8]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent environments , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[9]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Collaboration, Dialogue, and Human-Robot Interaction , 2001 .

[10]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Experiments in adjustable autonomy , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[11]  Željko Ban,et al.  Demining robots - requirements and constraints , 2001 .

[12]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Dynamic-Autonomy for Urban Search and Rescue , 2002, AAAI Mobile Robot Competition.

[13]  Kenzo Nonami,et al.  Development of mine detection robot COMET-II and COMET-III , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st SICE Annual Conference. SICE 2002..

[14]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Mixed-initiative control for remote characterization of hazardous environments , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Human-robot interaction: development of an evaluation methodology for the bystander role of interaction , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[16]  Guillermo Rodríguez-Ortiz,et al.  A New Method to Evaluate Human-Robot System Performance , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy and Human-Agent Teamwork in Practice: An Interim Report on Space Applications , 2003 .

[18]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[19]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Moonlight in Miami : A Field Study of Human-Robot Interaction in the Context of an Urban Search and Rescue Disaster Response Training Exercise , 2003 .

[20]  David D. Woods,et al.  Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[21]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[22]  Kurt Konolige,et al.  Large-Scale Map-Making , 2004, AAAI.

[23]  Aaron Steinfeld,et al.  Interface lessons for fully and semi-autonomous mobile robots , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[24]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  How to trust robots further than we can throw them , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[25]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Blending human and robot inputs for sliding scale autonomy , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[26]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Towards facilitating the use of a pan-tilt camera on a mobile robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[27]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  Shared understanding for collaborative control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[28]  Jose Barata,et al.  Two Sustainable and Compliant Robots for Humanitarian Demining , 2005 .

[29]  J. Barata,et al.  A multi-robot system for landmine detection , 2005, IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.

[30]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Network for Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[31]  Pablo González de Santos,et al.  DYLEMA: Using walking robots for landmine detection and location , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[32]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Testing the Usefulness of a Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) Camera in Human-Robot Interactions , 2006 .

[33]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Coordinated Multiagent Teams and Sliding Autonomy for Large-Scale Assembly , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[34]  Douglas A. Few,et al.  Improved Human-Robot Teaming through Facilitated Initiative , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  H. Yanco,et al.  Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction for Urban Search and Rescue , 2006 .

[36]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[37]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Comparing the usefulness of video and map information in navigation tasks , 2006, HRI '06.