Techno-economic and ex-ante environmental assessment of C6 sugars production from spruce and corn. Comparison of organosolv and wet milling technologies

Abstract This study assesses the techno-economic and environmental performance of C6 sugars production from softwood (spruce) and corn. Two technologies were considered in the assessment: organosolv of spruce woodchips (2nd generation) and corn wet milling (1st generation). Process models were developed to generate relevant data to assess the technical performance and derive inputs for the economic and environmental assessments. The economic assessment was carried out using Net Present Value (NPV) as indicator, while the environmental assessment followed a prospective cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) for 5 impact categories. The results indicate that when organosolv is integrated with an anaerobic digestion unit, the net energy requirements are lower than those of the wet milling process to produce an equivalent flowrate of C6 sugars. Assuming equivalent C6 sugar prices for the two technologies (300 €/t), the corn based technology shows positive NPV (178 M€) and lowest fixed capital investment requirements (55 M€). The organosolv technology (coupled to anaerobic digestion) also shows positive NPV (238 M€) at base case lignin prices (630 €/t), but higher fixed capital investment needs (236 M€). The economics of the organosolv process were found to be highly sensitive to sugar and lignin yields and prices as well as biomass feedstock costs. From an environmental perspective, the organosolv based routes show relatively better performance than corn wet milling, with 3 categories including climate change and non-renewable energy use showing lower impacts and 2 showing potentially higher impacts. Overall, the organosolv process (2nd generation) shows better performance from an environmental point of view in addition to a positive NPV. However, the inherent risks of new technologies and high investments associated with the 2nd generation technologies assessed in this work, mean that significant additional development, coupled with appropriate government support, are likely necessary before full-scale implementation.

[1]  Carlos A. Cardona,et al.  Techno-Economic Analysis of the Use of Fired Cogeneration Systems Based on Sugar Cane Bagasse in South Eastern and Mid-Western Regions of Mexico , 2014 .

[2]  G. S. Vijaya Raghavan,et al.  Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: A comprehensive review , 2013 .

[3]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Continuous production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose: a design case study , 2010 .

[4]  L. Nielsen,et al.  An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. , 2008 .

[5]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Ethanol production in biorefineries using lignocellulosic feedstock - GHG performance, energy balance and implications of life cycle calculation methodology. , 2014 .

[6]  Bert M. Weckhuysen,et al.  New insights into the structure and composition of technical lignins: a comparative characterisation study , 2016 .

[7]  Palligarnai T. Vasudevan,et al.  How to Estimate Utility Costs , 2006 .

[8]  Bert F. Sels,et al.  The importance of pretreatment and feedstock purity in the reductive splitting of (ligno)cellulose by metal supported USY zeolite , 2016 .

[9]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Engineering process and cost model for a conventional corn wet milling facility , 2008 .

[10]  V. Menon,et al.  Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept , 2012 .

[11]  Kes McCormick,et al.  Biorefineries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future , 2016 .

[12]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas assessment of European glucose production from corn – a multiple allocation approach for a key ingredient of the bio-based economy , 2013 .

[13]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited , 2010 .

[14]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  LCA of second generation bioethanol: A review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice , 2012 .

[15]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types , 2007 .

[16]  J. Reith,et al.  Ethanol-based organosolv fractionation of wheat straw for the production of lignin and enzymatically digestible cellulose. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Giuntoli Jacopo,et al.  Solid and gaseous bioenergy pathways: input values and GHG emissions , 2014 .

[18]  Mahmoud M El-Halwagi,et al.  Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Serge Domenech,et al.  Design of bioethanol green supply chain: Comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[20]  Patricia Thornley,et al.  European biorefineries: Implications for land, trade and employment , 2014 .

[21]  M. Meuwissen,et al.  Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion—A case of Green power biogas plant in The Netherlands , 2010 .

[22]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Fuels and plastics from lignocellulosic biomass via the furan pathway: an economic analysis , 2015 .

[23]  S. Maity.  Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II. , 2015 .

[24]  W. M. Griffin,et al.  Hybrid Input‐Output Life Cycle Assessment of First‐ and Second‐Generation Ethanol Production Technologies in Brazil , 2016 .

[25]  Ioannis V. Skiadas,et al.  Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems , 2009 .

[26]  Prasenjit Bhaumik,et al.  Efficient, stable, and reusable silicoaluminophosphate for the one-pot production of furfural from hemicellulose , 2013 .

[27]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[28]  Jan Seiler,et al.  Is biomass fractionation by Organosolv-like processes economically viable? A conceptual design study. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Fabrizio Bezzo,et al.  Spatially Explicit Multiobjective Optimization for the Strategic Design of First and Second Generation Biorefineries Including Carbon and Water Footprints , 2013 .

[30]  H. W. Elbersen,et al.  Rice Straw and Wheat Straw - Potential feedstocks for the Biobased Economy , 2013 .

[31]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals , 2010 .

[32]  V. Putsche,et al.  Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical property database for biofuels components , 1996 .

[33]  M. Budzinski,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of a wood-based biorefinery concept for the production of polymer-grade ethylene, organosolv lignin and fuel. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[34]  B. Weckhuysen,et al.  The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals. , 2010, Chemical reviews.