Considerations on direct stream flow measurements using video imagery: Outlook and research needs

Abstract The paper presents measurements acquired with Large-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV) during normal flows and floods in the Iowa River (U.S.A). For normal flows, comparison is made with measurements obtained with Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCP) in order to test LSPIV’s performance and to address concerns potentially affecting the accuracy of the measurements. The historic flood of the Iowa River during the summer of 2008 was captured for testing LSPIV capabilities during extreme flows. Lacking alternative measurements during the flood, the LSPIV measurements are compared to the rating curve extrapolated for high flows using a one-to-one discharge–stage relationship. The comparison reveals limitations of the single-values rating curve for providing discharge estimates during high flows. Finally, the paper summarizes lessons learned during these and previous LSPIV studies with the intent to chart the research needed to enhance this promising non-intrusive field measurement technique.

[2]  William J. Plant,et al.  measuring stream discharge by non‐contact methods: A Proof‐of‐Concept Experiment , 2000 .

[3]  André Paquier,et al.  Application and evaluation of LS-PIV technique for the monitoring of river surface velocities in high flow conditions , 2008 .

[4]  I. Nezu,et al.  Closure of "Field Measurements of Secondary Currents in Straight Rivers" , 1993 .

[5]  Asgeir Petersen-Øverleir,et al.  Modelling stage—discharge relationships affected by hysteresis using the Jones formula and nonlinear regression , 2006 .

[6]  R. Dinehart,et al.  Averaged indicators of secondary flow in repeated acoustic Doppler current profiler crossings of bends , 2005 .

[7]  R. T. Clarke,et al.  The use of Bayesian methods for fitting rating curves, with case studies , 2005 .

[8]  S. W. Lipscomb,et al.  Quality assurance plan for discharge measurements using broadband acoustic Doppler current profilers , 1995 .

[9]  Marian Muste,et al.  Validation and Extension of Image Velocimetry Capabilities for Flow Diagnostics in Hydraulic Modeling , 2004 .

[10]  Marian Muste,et al.  Large‐scale particle image velocimetry for measurements in riverine environments , 2008 .

[11]  R. Adrian.  Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[12]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[13]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Application of Video Image Analysis for Measurements of River-Surface Flows , 1994 .

[14]  David A. Eash,et al.  Floods of May and June 2008 in Iowa , 2010 .

[15]  S. Tan,et al.  Velocity Distribution and Dip-Phenomenon in Smooth Uniform Open Channel Flows , 2004 .

[16]  R. Hotchkiss,et al.  Acoustic Velocimetry for Riverine Environments , 2007 .

[17]  D. L. Fread,et al.  COMPUTATION OF STAGE‐DISCHARGE RELATIONSHIPS AFFECTED BY UNSTEADY FLOW , 1975 .

[18]  F. Henderson.  Open channel flow , 1966 .

[19]  Anton Kruger,et al.  Flow measurement in streams using video imagery , 2002 .

[20]  Anton Kruger,et al.  Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications , 1998 .

[21]  Anton Kruger,et al.  River gauging using PIV techniques: a proof of concept experiment on the Iowa River , 2003 .

[22]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Unseeded and seeded PIV measurements of river flows videotaped from a helicopter , 2003, J. Vis..

[23]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[24]  Yasuo Nihei,et al.  A new monitoring system for river discharge with horizontal acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements and river flow simulation , 2008 .

[25]  V. T. Chow.  Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[26]  Muthiah Perumal,et al.  Reproduction of Hysteresis in Rating Curves , 2004 .

[27]  Robert M. Hirsch,et al.  U.S. stream flow measurement and data dissemination improve , 2004 .