Interactions of Aircraft Design and Control: Actuators Sizing and Optimization for an Unstable Blended Wing-Body

In this paper the problem of integrated design and control for a civil blended wing-body aircraft is addressed. Indeed this configuration faces remarkable challenges related to handling qualities: namely the aircraft configuration in this study features a strong longitudinal instability for some specific flight points. Moreover it may lack control efficiency despite large and redundant movables. Stabilizing such a configuration may then lead to high control surfaces rates, meaning significant energy penalty and installation mass for flight control actuators, as well as challenges for actuators space allocation. Those penalties should therefore be taken into account early in the conceptual design phase, instead of being checked afterwards. Our approach consists in simultaneously designing a stabilizing controller and actuators dynamic characteristics, namely their bandwidth, for a given aircraft configuration. Our method relies on latest developments on nonsmooth optimization techniques for robust control design. For any aircraft configuration, guaranteed stability performance, as well as optimized control surfaces allocation with respect to their relative efficiency and inertia, are obtained. From these results, a segregation among trim and maneuver control surfaces is obtained, with guarantee that the later ones are able to cope with aircraft instability. Then it is checked that remaining trim control surfaces are sufficient for equilibrating the aircraft in any flight condition. This approach allows for a fast prototyping of control surfaces and actuators for unstable configurations. Different control surfaces layouts are evaluated in order to show the exibility of the method.

[1]  Gerald Carrier,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimizations of a Blended Wing Body Configuration for Several Wing Planforms , 2012 .

[2]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  On the coupling between the plant and controller optimization problems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[3]  I. Kaminer,et al.  Linear matrix inequalities in integrated aircraft/controller design , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[4]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Assessment of Electrically Actuated Redundant Control Surface Layouts for a Hybrid Wing Body Concept , 2014 .

[5]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Method for Evaluating Electrically Actuated Hybrid Wing–Body Control Surface Layouts , 2015 .

[6]  Manuel Saucez,et al.  Optimization of the Engine Failure on a Flying Wing Configuration. , 2012 .

[7]  Alexander Schirrer,et al.  Modeling and Control for a Blended Wing Body Aircraft , 2015 .

[8]  Norman Princen,et al.  CONTROL ALLOCATION CHALLENGES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BLENDED WING BODY , 2000 .

[9]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  Plant/controller optimization with applications to integrated surface sizing and feedback controller design for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[10]  D. Alazard,et al.  H∞ control design for generalized second order systems based on acceleration sensitivity function , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[11]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization Studies of a Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2014 .

[12]  Jian Liang Wang,et al.  An LMI-based optimization approach for integrated plant/output-feedback controller design , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[13]  Daniel Alazard,et al.  Avionics/Control co-design for large flexible space structures , 2013 .

[14]  Andreas Wildschek,et al.  Flight Dynamics and Control Related Challenges for Design of a Commercial Blended Wing Body Aircraft , 2014 .

[15]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  AERODYNAMIC DESIGN CHALLENGES OF THE BLENDED-WING-BODY SUBSONIC TRANSPORT , 2000 .

[16]  Kevin A. Wise,et al.  Flight Testing of Reconfigurable Control Law on the X-36 Tailless Aircraft , 2001 .

[17]  Christelle Pittet,et al.  Linear Dynamic Modeling of Spacecraft with Open-Chain Assembly of Flexible Bodies for ACS/Structure Co-design , 2015 .

[18]  Daniel Alazard,et al.  Integrated Design and Control of a Flying Wing Using Nonsmooth Optimization Techniques , 2015 .

[19]  Hugo Lhachemi,et al.  A structured H∞-based optimization approach for integrated plant and self-scheduled flight control system design , 2015 .

[20]  Gunter Stein,et al.  The practical, physical (and sometimes dangerous) consequences of control must be respected, and the underlying principles must be clearly and well taught. , 2003 .

[21]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Multidisciplinary Approach to Assessing Actuation Power of a Hybrid Wing–Body , 2016 .

[22]  D. J. Collins,et al.  X-29 H-infinity controller synthesis , 1992 .

[23]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  The interactions of design and control: double-effect distillation , 2000 .

[24]  R. J. Niewoehner,et al.  Integrated aircraft-controller design using linear matrix inequalities , 1996 .

[25]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Control-Configuration Integration in Aircraft Conceptual Design , 2006 .