Dual-use as Knowledge-Oriented Policy: France during the 1990-2000s

This contribution aims at demonstrating that dual-use policies represent now a dimension central to military R&D policies and should not be understood only as a transfer mechanism between the civilian and the military. The paper investigates the concept of dual-use policies in the framework of Knowledge-Oriented Policies (KOP). Il will elaborate on the conditions of the emergence and development of dual-use policies. From a conceptual perspective, it will point out the difficulty associated with sequential and linear interpretations of innovation processes associated with armaments programmes. The main important critic developed in this contribution relates to the simplistic view associated with armaments life cycle, which hardly accounts for the complexity of exchanges and the reality of decision-making in military R&D.

[1]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[2]  Knut Blind,et al.  Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications , 2004 .

[3]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[4]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification , 2001 .

[5]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[6]  Henry Ergas,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance: The importance of technology policy , 1987 .

[7]  G. Tassey.  Standardization in technology-based markets , 2000 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development , 1995 .

[10]  Jens Nyholm,et al.  Innovation Policy in the Knowledge‐based Economy—Can Theory Guide Policy Making? , 2002 .

[11]  L. Nesta,et al.  What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb , 1999 .

[12]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[13]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[14]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[15]  D. Foray.  Economics of knowledge , 2004 .

[16]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance , 2000 .

[17]  Jay Stowsky,et al.  Secrets to shield or share? new dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age , 2004 .

[18]  John A. Alic,et al.  Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World , 1992 .

[19]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[20]  Jacques S. Gansler,et al.  Defense Conversion: Transforming the Arsenal of Democracy , 1996 .

[21]  A. Amin,et al.  Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities , 2004 .

[22]  Jordi Molas-Gallart,et al.  Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of 'dual-use' technology transfer , 1997 .

[23]  Renelle Guichard.  Suggested repositioning of defence R&D within the French system of innovation , 2005 .