Model based learning and instruction in science

Introduction: A 'Hidden World' Of Nonformal Expert Reasoning 1.1 Why Study Nonformal Reasoning? 1.2 The Background From Which I Approached This Work 1.3 Methodology: Qualitative Nature Of The Study 1.4 General Features Of The Descriptive Methodology Used 1.5 General Theoretical Framework 1.6 Section Summaries And Approaches To Reading This Book PART ONE: ANALOGIES, MODELS AND CREATIVE LEARNING IN EXPERTS AND STUDENTS SECTION I: EXPERT REASONING AND LEARNING VIA ANALOGY 2 Major Subprocesses Involved in Spontaneous Analogical Reasoning 2.1 Some Major Issues in Analogical Reasoning 2.2 Method of Study 2.3 Initial Observations from Transcripts 2.4 Major processes used in analogical reasoning 2.5 Conclusion 3 Methods Experts Use to Generate Analogies 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Basic Concepts and Observations 3.3 Discussion 4 Methods Experts Use to Evaluate an Analogy Relation 4.1 The Importance of Establishing the Validity of an Analogy Relation 4.2 Examples from Case Studies 4.3 Analogy Evaluation in the Doughnut Problem 4.4 Discussion of Findings and Connections to History of Science 4.5 Summary 5 Expert Methods for Developing an Understanding of the Analogous Case and Transferring Findings 5.1 Evaluating and Developing Understanding of the Analogous Case. 5.2 Transferring Findings 5.3 Summary on Creative Analogy Generation SECTION II: MODEL CONSTRUCTION AND SCIENTIFIC INSIGHT IN EXPERTS 6 Case Study of Model Construction Cycles in Expert Reasoning 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Background Questions from Philosophy of Science 6.3 How Are Theoretical Hypotheses Formed in the Individual Scientist? 6.4 Protocol Evidence on Construction Cycles That Use Analogies 6.5 Summary of Evidence For AModel Construction Cycle as A Non-Inductive Source for Hypotheses 6.6 Major Nonformal Reasoning Patterns in the Preceding Chapters 7 Creativity and Scientific Insight in the Case Study for S2 7.1 Eureka or Accretion? The Presence of Insight in S2's Protocol 7.2 Creative Mental Processes 7.3 Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection 7.4 Initial List of Features of Creative Thinking from this Case Study and Remaining Challenges SECTION III: NONFORMAL REASONING IN STUDENTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION 8 Spontaneous Analogies Generated by Students Solving Science Problems 8.1 Use of Analogies by Students 8.2 Conclusion 8.3 Appendix: Examples of Problems and Spontaneous Analogies 9 Case Study of a Student who Counters and Improves his own Misconception by Generating a Chain of Analogies 9.1 Spontaneous Analogies in a Student's Problem Solution 9.2 Conclusion 10 Using Analogies and Models in Instruction to Deal with Students Preconceptions 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Teaching Strategy 10.3 Teaching Interviews 10.4 Applications to Classroom Teaching 10.5 Conclusion 10.5.2 Explanatory Models vs. Specific Analogous Cases PART TWO: ADVANCED USES OF IMAGERY AND PLAUSIBLE REASONING IN SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS SECTION IV: IMAGERY AND PHYSICAL INTUITION IN EXPERTS AND STUDENTS 11 Analogy, Extreme Cases, and Spatial Transformations in Mathematical Problem Solving by Experts 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Case Study of Analogical Reasoning in a Mathematics Problem 11.3 Results on the Use of Analogies for Eight Subjects 11.4 Other Creative Non-formal Reasoning Processes 11.5 Discussion 11.6 Conclusion 12 Depictive Gestures and Other Case Study Evidence for Mental Simulation in Experts and Students 12.1 Introduction 12.2

[1]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[2]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Students’ reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis , 1998 .

[3]  William W. Cobern,et al.  Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. , 1993 .

[4]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personally-seeded discussions , 2005, CSCL.

[5]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  An Unintended Consequence , 2008 .

[6]  John J. Clement,et al.  Should Different Types of Analogies be Treated Differently in Instruction? Observations from a Middle-School Life Science Curriculum , 2003 .

[7]  D. Gentner,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: How people construct mental models , 1987 .

[8]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[9]  C S Porter,et al.  Grade School Children's Perceptions of Their Internal Body Parts , 1974, Nursing research.

[10]  J. Maxwell A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field , .

[11]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Faraday’s Field Concept , 1985 .

[12]  Scott O. Lilienfeld,et al.  What's wrong with this picture? , 2001, Scientific American.

[13]  Chin Cheng Chou,et al.  Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change: Analysis of Constructing Mental Models of Chemical Equilibrium , 2002 .

[14]  John J. Clement,et al.  Teaching chemistry using guided discovery and an interactive computer tool , 2002 .

[15]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[16]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[17]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Relating Students' Personal Frameworks for Science Learning to Their Cognition in Collaborative Contexts. , 1999 .

[18]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change , 1997 .

[19]  J. Clement Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability , 2000 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  The Snowball Phenomenon: Spread of Ways of Talking and Ways of Thinking Across Groups of Children , 2001 .

[21]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition , 1988 .

[22]  P. Taylor Constructivist approaches to science teaching , 1999 .

[23]  G. Hatano,et al.  TWO COURSES OF EXPERTISE , 1984 .

[24]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education , 2000 .

[25]  K. Tobin The Role of Wait Time in Higher Cognitive Level Learning , 1987 .

[26]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling , 1992, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[27]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Reflective discourse: developing shared understandings in a physics classroom , 1997 .

[28]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  Thinking and working scientifically : the role of analogical and mental models , 2001 .

[29]  J. Clement Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation , 2008 .

[30]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[31]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Understanding cellular respiration: An analysis of conceptual change in college biology , 1994 .

[32]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[33]  G. Hatano Commentary: Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. , 1993 .

[34]  Merrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[36]  J. Clement The Role of Explanatory Models in Teaching for Conceptual Change , 2008 .

[37]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Toward a theory of teaching-in-context , 1998 .

[38]  E. Gail Chandler Level Playing Field , 2005 .

[39]  Helen L. Gibson,et al.  Keeping the Inquiry in Curriculum Designed To Help Students' Conceptual Understanding of Cellular Respiration. , 2002 .

[40]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Inquiry in a Physics Class Discussion , 1995 .

[41]  R. Tweney Faraday’s Discovery of Induction: A Cognitive Approach , 1985 .

[42]  R. Giere,et al.  Cognitive Models of Science Vol. 15 , 1992 .

[43]  P. Cobb The Tension Between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education , 1988 .

[44]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism , 1997 .

[45]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model competition: a strategy based on model based teaching and learning theory , 2003 .

[46]  Cristian Raduta,et al.  General students' misconceptions related to Electricity and Magnetism , 2005, physics/0503132.

[47]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[48]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[49]  P. Thagard Coherent and Creative Conceptual Combinations. , 1997 .

[50]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter , 1991 .

[51]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[52]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Perceptual Simulation in Analogical Problem Solving , 2002 .

[53]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[54]  A. Graesser,et al.  The Psychology of Questions , 1985 .

[55]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Scientific Thinking: A Cognitive- Historical Approach , 2001 .

[56]  L. West,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change , 1985 .

[57]  Nunez Oviedo,et al.  Teacher-student co-construction processes in biology: Strategies for developing mental models in large group discussions , 2004 .

[58]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  The use of analogies in written text , 1984 .

[59]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science , 2001 .

[60]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[61]  N. Nersessian Should physicists preach what they practice? , 1995 .

[62]  Kathleen Ellis,et al.  Teacher Questioning Behavior and Student Learning: What Research Says to Teachers. , 1993 .

[63]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[64]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[65]  John J. Clement,et al.  Learning via model construction and criticism: protocol evidence on sources of creativity in science , 1988 .

[66]  J. Gobert A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding , 2000 .

[67]  David Gooding,et al.  Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867 , 1989 .

[68]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking , 1997 .

[69]  Edgar Wallace,et al.  On the Spot , 1969 .

[70]  R. Giere Cognitive Models of Science , 1992 .

[71]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Learning from analogy‐enhanced science text , 1998 .

[72]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  The Use of Questions in Teaching , 1970 .

[73]  M H NAGY,et al.  Children's conceptions of some bodily functions. , 1953, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[74]  J. Clement Learning via Model Construction and Criticism , 1989 .

[75]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1989 .

[76]  John J. Clement,et al.  Evolving Mental Models of Electric Circuits , 2001 .

[77]  T. Kubo,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields , 2008 .

[78]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[79]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[80]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model based learning as a key research area for science education , 2000 .

[81]  Rom Harré,et al.  The Philosophies of Science: An Introductory Survey. , 1972 .

[82]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[83]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[84]  James A. Stewart,et al.  Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: an example from high school genetics , 1990 .

[85]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[86]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  A Cognitive-Historical Approach to Meaning in Scientific Theories , 1987 .

[87]  John J. Clement,et al.  Strategy Levels for Guiding Discussion to Promote Explanatory Model Construction in Circuit Electricity , 2007 .

[88]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[89]  Noretta Koertge,et al.  Theory Change in Science , 1973 .

[90]  R. Duit On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[91]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Children's Ideas About Matter , 1991 .

[92]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[93]  John J. Clement,et al.  Imagistic Simulation in Scientific Model Construction , 2003 .

[94]  M. Hennessey Probing the Dimensions of Metacognition: Implications for Conceptual Change Teaching-Learning. , 1999 .

[95]  K. Hakuta,et al.  Child development and education in Japan. , 1986 .

[96]  M. Gall Synthesis of Research on Teachers' Questioning. , 1984 .

[97]  C D TAIT,et al.  Inside-of-the-body fest; a preliminary report. , 1955, Psychosomatic medicine.

[98]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  Constrained person analogy in young children's biological inference☆ , 1991 .

[99]  John J. Clement Model construction and criticism cycles in expert reasoning , 1993 .

[100]  U. Goswami Analogical reasoning in children , 1993 .

[101]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[102]  Mary Anne Rea-Ramirez,et al.  Models of conceptual understanding in human respiration and strategies for instruction , 1998 .

[103]  Rob van der Noll Competition for a Prize , 2006 .

[104]  Melvin S. Steinberg,et al.  Constructive Model Evolution in the Study of Electric Circuits , 1997 .

[105]  Gary R Jernberg How does that work? , 2007, Northwest dentistry.

[106]  David Neubert,et al.  Teaching with Analogies , 1987 .

[107]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy , 1982 .

[108]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[109]  J. Clement,et al.  Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions , 1989 .

[110]  Maria Cecilia Nunez-Oviedo,et al.  Discrepant Questioning as a Tool To Build Complex Mental Models of Respiration. , 2002 .

[111]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[112]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics , 1996 .

[113]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[114]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argument in school science , 2001 .

[115]  K. Cotton,et al.  Monitoring Student Learning in the Classroom , 2009 .

[116]  Silvan S. Schweber,et al.  The origin of theOrigin revisited , 1977 .

[117]  Donald A. Stepich,et al.  Instructional analogies and the learning of concepts , 1995 .

[118]  Eric W. Weisstein Right-Hand Rule , 2000 .

[119]  G. Forman,et al.  Constructivism in the computer age , 1988 .

[120]  Janis A. Bulgren,et al.  The Use and Effectiveness of Analogical Instruction in Diverse Secondary Content Classrooms. , 2000 .

[121]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Role of Dissonance in Conceptual Change , 1998 .

[122]  Melvin S. Steinberg,et al.  Electromagnetic waves without Maxwell’s equations , 1983 .

[123]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  Learning Processes in Electric Circuits , 1998 .

[124]  D. Perkins,et al.  Informal reasoning and education , 1991 .

[125]  Melvin S. Steinberg,et al.  Using models to teach electricity—The CASTLE project , 1993 .

[126]  David E. Brown,et al.  Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction , 1989 .