Postmortem analysis of encapsulation around long-term ventricular endocardial pacing leads.

OBJECTIVE To analyze the site and thickness of encapsulation around ventricular endocardial pacing leads and the extent of tricuspid valve adhesion, from today's perspective, with implications for lead removal and sensor location. MATERIAL AND METHODS Gross cardiac postmortem analysis was performed in 11 cases (8 female and 3 male patients; mean age, 78+/-7 years). None of the patients had died because of pacemaker malfunction. The mean implant time was 61+/-60 months (range, 4 to 184). RESULTS The observations ranged from encapsulation only at the tip of the pacing lead to complete encapsulation along the entire length of the pacing lead within the right ventricle. Substantial areas of adhesion at the tricuspid valve apparatus were noted in 7 of the 11 cases (64%). The firmly attached leads could be removed only by dissection, and in some cases, removal was possible only by damaging the associated structures. No specific optimal site for sensor placement could be identified along the ventricular portion of the pacing leads; however, the fibrotic response was relatively less prominent in the atrial chamber. CONCLUSION Extensive encapsulation is present in most long-term pacemaker leads, which may complicate lead removal. The site and thickness of encapsulation seem to be highly variable. Tricuspid valve adhesion, which is usually underestimated, may be severe. In contrast to earlier reports, our study demonstrates that the extent of fibrotic encapsulation may not be related to the duration since lead implantation. Moreover, we noted no ideal encapsulation-free site for sensors on the ventricular portion of long-term pacing leads.

[1]  C. Kennergren First European Experience Using Excimer Laser for the Extraction of Permanent Pacemaker Leads , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  P. Arnsbo,et al.  Appraisal of Pacing Lead Performance from the Danish Pacemaker Register , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  J. Anderson,et al.  The encapsulation of polyurethane-insulated transvenous cardiac pacemaker leads. , 1995, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[4]  T. D. Sellers,et al.  Five‐Years Experience with Intravascular Lead Extraction , 1994 .

[5]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Intravascular Extraction of Chronic Pacemaker Leads: Efficacy and Follow‐Up , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  C. Byrd,et al.  Intravascular techniques for extraction of permanent pacemaker leads. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  A. Bernstein,et al.  Extraction of implanted transvenous pacing leads: a review of a persistent clinical problem. , 1991, American heart journal.

[8]  T. D. Sellers,et al.  Intravascular Lead Extraction Using Locking Stylets, Sheaths, and Other Techniques , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  N. Fearnot,et al.  Intravascular Lead Extraction Using Locking Stylets and Sheaths , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  N. Baba,et al.  Cardiac pathology of transvenous pacemakers. , 1972, American heart journal.

[11]  S. Robboy,et al.  Autopsy Findings with Permanent Pervenous Pacemakers , 1969, Circulation.

[12]  S Furman,et al.  Retained endocardial pacemaker electrodes. , 1968, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  I. R. Zucker,et al.  The fate of permanent intracardiac electrodes. , 1966, The Journal of surgical research.

[14]  N. C. Birkhead,et al.  HUMAN TISSUE RESPONSE TO LONG TERM IMPLANTED CARDIAC PACEMAKER-ELECTRODE SYSTEM. , 1963, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.