Knowledge Management in a Virtual Community of Practice using Discourse Analysis

The topic of Community-of-Practice (CoP) has been discussed in the management literature in the earlier part of 1990’s, and since attracted a lot of attention from academics and professionals around the globe. Communities of Practice (CoP) have become a strategic approach for fostering learning and transferring knowledge. However, there are a few studies, which explain what makes a community to engage in a discussion to share their knowledge and experience. This paper discusses the anatomy of a CoP, and examines a number of knowledge management tools such as story telling and discourse analysis to illustrate how knowledge is transferred and learning takes place in a virtual Community of Practice. Results are presented from a ‘live’ virtual community of practice, which is in the maturity period of its life cycle to discuss the role of domain experts and moderators how they facilitate to engage the community in dialogues and help generate the new knowledge. Also using Nonaka and Takeuchi’s knowledge spiral model it is explained how learning takes place in this virtual community of practice.

[1]  Line Dubé,et al.  The Success of Virtual Communities of Practice : The Leadership Factor , 2005 .

[2]  Khalid Hafeez,et al.  Dynamics of human resource and knowledge management , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[4]  R. McDermott.  Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[5]  Khalid Hafeez,et al.  Identifying core competence , 2002 .

[6]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Knowledge management methodologies , 2006 .

[7]  David Palfreyman,et al.  "A Funky Language for Teenzz to Use": Representing Gulf Arabic in Instant Messaging , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  D. Cohen,et al.  Toward a Knowledge Context: Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm , 1998 .

[9]  Simeon J. Yates.  Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing , 1996 .

[10]  Roger S. White,et al.  Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know , 2001 .

[11]  Robert F. Dennehy.  The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge‐era Organizations , 2001 .

[12]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice and social learning systems”. Organization :. , 2000 .

[13]  Raul Espejo,et al.  Organizational Transformation and Learning: A Cybernetic Approach to Management , 1996 .

[14]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Language Choice Online: Globalization and Identity in Egypt , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Feng Li,et al.  Effective Virtual Teams through Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  The People Are the Company , 1995 .

[17]  M. Sharratt,et al.  Understanding Knowledge-Sharing in Online Communities of Practice , 2003 .

[18]  Khalid Hafeez,et al.  Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: a structured methodology for identifying core competence , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[19]  K. Ahmad,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in a Community of Practice : a Text-Based Approach in Emergent Domains , 2006 .

[20]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Computer Mediated Communications and Communities of Practice , 2005 .

[21]  K. Hafeez,et al.  Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[22]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[23]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[24]  Lorraine Sherry.  The Nature and Purpose of Online Discourse: A Brief Synthesis of Current Research as related to The WEB Project , 2000 .