Numerical modeling of multi-stage tube hydropiercing

Abstract Hydropiercing is a cost-effective method for piercing holes in a hydroformed tubular structure. When the tube wall around a pierced hole is also extruded toward the inside of the tube, brackets or other connecting parts can be fastened to the hydroformed structure by inserting a self-tapping screw into the extruded hole. In this study, three-dimensional finite element simulations of the hydroforming, hydropiercing and wall extrusion of a DP600 steel tube were performed using different damage criteria. The constant equivalent plastic strain, with and without cut-off stress-triaxiality values (CEPS+C and CEPS, respectively) and the Johnson–Cook (JC) damage criterion were considered as phenomenological damage models, and the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) criterion was used as a micro-mechanical damage model. In order to calibrate the parameters in each model, tube-piercing tests were conducted and the punch load versus displacement response was determined. The damage parameters were then calibrated by correlating the predicted punch load versus displacement behavior to the experimental data, considering particularly the load reduction behavior when the slug breaks through. The calibrated damage parameters were then used in simulations of the multi-stage hydropiercing and tube-wall extrusion process and the accuracy of each damage criterion was evaluated in terms of the predicted deformation and damage behavior. The damage accumulation direction during the hydropiercing, depth of roll-over, and tube extruded length were the main parameters in the evaluation of each damage criteria. JC and CEPS+C criteria showed the best agreement with the experimental observations.

[1]  H. Majedi,et al.  of Strain History on Ductile Failure of Steel , 1998 .

[2]  Weigang Zhang,et al.  Ductile fracture simulation of hydropiercing process based on various criteria in 3D modeling , 2010 .

[3]  Said Ahzi,et al.  Finite elements simulations of thin copper sheets blanking: Study of blanking parameters on sheared edge quality , 2008 .

[4]  A. Needleman,et al.  Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar , 1984 .

[5]  Kozo Osakada,et al.  Piercing of Steel Sheet by using Hydrostatic Pressure , 2006 .

[6]  D Dirk Brokken,et al.  Numerical modelling of ductile fracture in blanking , 1999 .

[7]  F. Rahimi Dehgolan,et al.  Determination of the constants of damage models , 2011 .

[8]  Sang Wan Lee,et al.  Finite element simulation of the punchless piercing process with Lemaitre damage model , 2005 .

[9]  A. Gurson Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth and interaction , 1988 .

[10]  Nader Asnafi,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Hydropiercing , 2003 .

[11]  Alan Needleman,et al.  Void growth and coalescence in porous plastic solids , 1988 .

[12]  Zengtao Chen,et al.  Damage-based finite-element modeling of tube hydroforming , 2009 .

[13]  D. Agard,et al.  Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  Young-Woong Lee Fracture prediction in metal sheets , 2005 .

[15]  Young Hoon Moon,et al.  Analysis of deformation surrounding a hole produced by tube hydro-piercing , 2004 .

[16]  Ridha Hambli,et al.  Fracture criteria identification using an inverse technique method and blanking experiment , 2002 .

[17]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models , 2005 .

[18]  T. Frank,et al.  Recent development and applications of the Gurson model , 2006 .