Beyond Carbon: Enabling Justice and Equity in REDD+ Across Levels of Governance

The global nature of climate change and the globalization of environmental governance have highlighted the challenges of enabling justice and equity across diverse societies and multiple levels of governance. At the center of these challenges are ongoing debates over the distribution of rights and responsibilities for environmental and social impacts e.g., to what degree are developed countries responsible for climate disasters and developing countries responsible for adapting to them?; what rights do global versus national and local actors have to steer decision-making?; and what are the relative rights of present versus future generations or human versus non-human species? These debates have been variously framed in normative terms, drawing on particular norms of justice or equity as de facto goals in and of themselves, or based in instrumentalist arguments, e.g., the importance of justice and equity to achieving lasting emissions reductions. Perhaps nowhere have these debates been more complex and multi-faceted than under Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+), a mechanism of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

[1]  K. Brown Cut and run? Evolving institutions for global forest governance , 2001 .

[2]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[3]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation , 2010 .

[4]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance? , 2010, Science.

[5]  J. Ribot,et al.  REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance , 2010 .

[6]  Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers,et al.  Interdisciplinary perspectives on REDD+ Editorial overview , 2012 .

[7]  L. Verchot,et al.  Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. , 2012 .

[8]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: actors, interests and ideas , 2012 .

[9]  D. Mcneill,et al.  Analysing REDD+. Challenges and choices , 2012 .

[10]  T. Sikor Introduction: Linking ecosystem services with environmental justice , 2013 .

[11]  C. McDermott,et al.  Law, tropical forests and carbon: the case of REDD+. , 2013 .

[12]  T. Forsyth,et al.  Forests, development and the globalisation of justice , 2013 .

[13]  K. Nicholas,et al.  Evaluating safeguards in a conservation incentive program : participation, consent, and benefit sharing in indigenous communities of the Ecuadorian Amazon , 2013 .

[14]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities , 2013 .

[15]  M. Brockhaus,et al.  Equity and REDD+ in the Media: a Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses , 2013 .

[16]  A. Savaresi REDD+ and Human Rights: Addressing Synergies between International Regimes , 2013 .

[17]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[18]  Tran Nguyen Bang,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Beyond Carbon: Enabling Justice and Equity in REDD+ Across Levels of Governance Community Monitoring for REDD+: International Promises and Field Realities , 2013 .

[19]  L. Rival From Carbon Projects to Better Land-Use Planning: Three Latin American Initiatives , 2013 .

[20]  Linda Wallbott Research, part of a Special Feature on Beyond Carbon: Enabling Justice and Equity in REDD+ Across Levels of Governance Indigenous Peoples in UN REDD+ Negotiations: "Importing Power" and Lobbying for Rights through Discursive Interplay Management , 2014 .