Design Guidelines of Social-Assisted Robots for the Elderly: A Mixed Method Systematic Literature Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jenay M. Beer,et al. Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise , 2017, PloS one.
[2] Ning Wang,et al. The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly , 2017, Intelligent Service Robotics.
[3] Sanja Dogramadzi,et al. Exploiting ability for human adaptation to facilitate improved human-robot interaction and acceptance , 2018, Inf. Soc..
[4] F. Colombo. Help wanted? : providing and paying for long-term care , 2011 .
[5] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[6] Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al. Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[7] David R. Jones,et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods , 2005 .
[8] Stefano Ferilli,et al. Simulating empathic behavior in a social assistive robot , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.
[9] J. Ioannidis,et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].
[10] Sukhan Lee,et al. Toward a Sociable and Dependable Elderly Care Robot: Design, Implementation and User Study , 2020, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..
[11] Barbara Klein,et al. Acceptance of Social Robots by Elder People: Does Psychosocial Functioning Matter? , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[13] Tatsuya Nomura,et al. Will Older Adults Accept a Humanoid Robot as a Walking Partner? , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[14] J. Broekens,et al. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .
[15] Alex Mihailidis,et al. Social Robots and Seniors: A Comparative Study on the Influence of Dynamic Social Features on Human–Robot Interaction , 2018, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[16] Andreas R. Luft,et al. Encouragement-Induced Real-World Upper Limb Use after Stroke by a Tracking and Feedback Device: A Study Protocol for a Multi-Center, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Front. Neurol..
[17] Su-Ling Yeh,et al. Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults’ Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study , 2019, Gerontology.
[18] Angelo Cangelosi,et al. Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.
[19] A. Harden,et al. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.
[20] Rajiv Khosla,et al. Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[21] H. Eftring,et al. Designing a social and assistive robot for seniors , 2016, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.
[22] Wendy A. Rogers,et al. Understanding the potential of PARO for healthy older adults , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[23] Gábor Fazekas,et al. Evaluation of a companion robot based on field tests with single older adults in their homes , 2018, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[24] D. Tzovaras,et al. Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments , 2018, Front. Neurol..