Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response.

Ecologists have long searched for a framework of a priori species traits to help predict predator-prey interactions in food webs. Empirical evidence has shown that predator hunting mode and predator and prey habitat domain are useful traits for explaining predator-prey interactions. Yet, individual experiments have yet to replicate predator hunting mode, calling into question whether predator impacts can be attributed to hunting mode or merely species identity. We tested the effects of spider predators with sit-and-wait, sit-and-pursue and active hunting modes on grasshopper habitat domain, activity and mortality in a grassland system. We replicated hunting mode by testing two spider predator species of each hunting mode on the same grasshopper prey species. We observed grasshoppers with and without each spider species in behavioural cages and measured their mortality rates, movements and habitat domains. We likewise measured the movements and habitat domains of spiders to characterize hunting modes. We found that predator hunting mode explained grasshopper mortality and spider and grasshopper movement activity and habitat domain size. Sit-and-wait spider predators covered small distances over a narrow domain space and killed fewer grasshoppers than sit-and-pursue and active predators, which ranged farther distances across broader domains and killed more grasshoppers, respectively. Prey adjusted their activity levels and horizontal habitat domains in response to predator presence and hunting mode: sedentary sit-and-wait predators with narrow domains caused grasshoppers to reduce activity in the same-sized domain space; more mobile sit-and-pursue predators with broader domains caused prey to reduce their activity within a contracted horizontal (but not vertical) domain space; and highly mobile active spiders led grasshoppers to increase their activity across the same domain area. All predators impacted prey activity, and sit-and-pursue predators generated strong effects on domain size. This study demonstrates the validity of utilizing hunting mode and habitat domain for predicting predator-prey interactions. Results also highlight the importance of accounting for flexibility in prey movement ranges as an anti-predator response rather than treating the domain as a static attribute.

[1]  J. Griffin,et al.  Top predators suppress rather than facilitate plants in a trait-mediated tri-trophic cascade , 2011, Biology Letters.

[2]  Daniel C. Moon,et al.  Effects of habitat complexity, prey type, and abundance on intraguild predation between larval odonates , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Contrasting cascade effects of carnivores on plant fitness: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[4]  Nathan R. Geraldi,et al.  Subtle changes in prey foraging behavior have cascading effects in a shallow estuary , 2011 .

[5]  B. Woodcock,et al.  Disentangling the effects of predator hunting mode and habitat domain on the top-down control of insect herbivores. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Jason M. Tylianakis,et al.  Natural enemy diversity and biological control: Making sense of the context-dependency , 2010 .

[7]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Physiological Stress as a Fundamental Mechanism Linking Predation to Ecosystem Functioning , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[8]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Food-web composition affects cross-ecosystem interactions and subsidies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Herbivore physiological response to predation risk and implications for ecosystem nutrient dynamics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Resolving Ecosystem Complexity (MPB-47) , 2010 .

[11]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Resolving Ecosystem Complexity , 2010 .

[12]  M. Strand,et al.  Antipredator behavior of Colorado potato beetle larvae differs by instar and attacking predator , 2010 .

[13]  W. Ripple,et al.  The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Being Afraid~!2009-09-09~!2009-11-16~!2010-02-02~! , 2010 .

[14]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Adaptive foragers and community ecology: linking individuals to communities and ecosystems , 2010 .

[15]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Experimental warming transforms multiple predator effects in a grassland food web. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[16]  J. Rehage,et al.  Antipredator Responses by Native Mosquitofish to Non‐Native Cichlids: An Examination of the Role of Prey Naiveté , 2009 .

[17]  S. Creel,et al.  Glucocorticoid stress hormones and the effect of predation risk on elk reproduction , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  M. Michel,et al.  Differential effects of structural complexity on predator foraging behavior , 2009 .

[19]  A. Persson,et al.  Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes , 2008, Oecologia.

[20]  P. Abrams Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions. , 2008, Ecology.

[21]  Thomas Steinmann,et al.  The Aerodynamic Signature of Running Spiders , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[24]  O. J. Schmidt Behavior of predators and prey and links with population-level processes , 2005 .

[25]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic cascades : the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions , 2004 .

[26]  P. Sollins,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: In Pursuit of Principles , 2003 .

[27]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[28]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old‐field ecosystem , 2003 .

[29]  M. Dicke,et al.  Chemical Detection of Natural Enemies by Arthropods: An Ecological Perspective , 2001 .

[30]  O. Schmitz,et al.  EFFECTS OF TOP PREDATOR SPECIES ON DIRECT AND INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN A FOOD WEB , 2001 .

[31]  O. Schmitz Direct and Indirect Effects of Predation and Predation Risk in Old‐Field Interaction Webs , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Robert L. McLaughlin,et al.  Search Modes of Birds and Lizards: Evidence for Alternative Movement Patterns , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  Ecological Consequences of Foraging Mode , 1981 .

[34]  Received , 1868, Buffalo medical and surgical journal.

[35]  Jeff S. Wesner,et al.  Predator diversity effects cascade across an ecosystem boundary , 2012 .

[36]  D. Yee Behavior and aquatic plants as factors affecting predation by three species of larval predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[37]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks--beyond food webs. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[38]  M. Persons,et al.  The effect of prior exposure to predator cues on chemically-mediated defensive behavior and survival in the wolf spider Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2007 .