The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David J. Prottas,et al. Relationships Among Faculty Perceptions of Their Tenure Process and Their Commitment and Engagement , 2017 .
[2] James S. Fairweather,et al. Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization , 1993 .
[3] M. Seipel,et al. Assessing Publication for Tenure , 2003 .
[4] Peter Suber. Thoughts on prestige, quality, and open access , 2010 .
[5] Stephen Curry. Let's move beyond the rhetoric: it's time to change how we judge research. , 2018 .
[6] Sudeep Sarkar,et al. Changing the academic culture: Valuing patents and commercialization toward tenure and career advancement , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] Linda K. Johnsrud,et al. Barriers to Tenure for Women and Minorities , 2017 .
[8] E. Garfield. Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[9] R. Green,et al. THE SECOND DECADE OF THE FACULTY PUBLICATION PROJECT: JOURNAL ARTICLE PUBLICATIONS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP , 2007 .
[10] Vincent Larivière,et al. The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects , 2015 .
[11] Executive Summary,et al. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary , 2010 .
[12] B. Brembs. Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[13] Björn Brembs,et al. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[14] Hewitt W. Matthews,et al. Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty. , 2007, American journal of pharmaceutical education.
[15] W. Edwards,et al. African American faculty expressing concerns: breaking the silence at predominantly white research oriented universities , 2016 .
[16] David H. Sinason,et al. Pitfalls of Using Citation Indices for Making Academic Accounting Promotion, Tenure, Teaching Load, and Merit Pay Decisions , 2011 .
[17] Karen Whalen,et al. Perceptions of Tenure and Tenure Reform in Academic Pharmacy , 2014, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
[18] M. Mahoney,et al. Open exchange and epistemic progress. , 1985 .
[19] Christina K. Pikas,et al. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.
[20] Blaise Cronin,et al. E-Journals and Tenure , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[21] Peter S. Li,et al. The Equity Myth: Racialization and Indigeneity at Canadian Universities , 2017 .
[22] Janet Dagenais Brown. Citation searching for tenure and promotion: an overview of issues and tools , 2014 .
[23] Stephen Curry,et al. Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge research , 2018, Nature.
[24] Tony Ross-Hellauer,et al. What is open peer review? A systematic review , 2017, F1000Research.
[25] Jeremy W. Fox. Can blogging change how ecologists share ideas? In economics, it already has. , 2012 .
[26] Robert M. Diamond,et al. Changing Priorities at Research Universities, 1991-1996. Based on: The National Study of Research Universities on the Balance between Research and Undergraduate Teaching (1992), by Peter J. Gray, Robert C. Froh, Robert M. Diammond. , 1998 .
[27] B. Malsch,et al. Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization , 2015 .
[28] Benedikt V. Ehinger,et al. Faculty Opinions recommendation of PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. , 2015 .
[29] Brett Thomas Buttliere,et al. Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[30] Ted I. K. Youn,et al. Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions , 2009 .
[31] Brian A. Nosek,et al. How open science helps researchers succeed , 2016, eLife.
[32] Jennifer J. Otten,et al. Getting Research to the Policy Table: A Qualitative Study With Public Health Researchers on Engaging With Policy Makers , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.
[33] S. Haustein,et al. Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science , 2018 .
[34] C. Feghali-Bostwick,et al. Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors that Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers , 2018 .
[35] Gaines H. Liner,et al. Research requirements for promotion and tenure at PhD granting departments of economics , 2009 .
[36] R. Schonfeld,et al. Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2015 , 2016 .
[37] Susan K. Gardner,et al. Evincing the Ratchet: A Thematic Analysis of the Promotion and Tenure Guidelines at a Striving University , 2014 .
[38] S. Acker,et al. Discipline and Publish: The Tenure Review Process in Ontario Universities , 2016 .
[39] Mary Anne Holmes,et al. What Does It Take to Get Tenure , 2004 .
[40] Relative Importance of Performance Criteria in Promotion and Tenure Decisions: Perceptions of Pharmacy Faculty Members , 1995 .
[41] R. Menges,et al. Barriers to the Progress of Women and Minority Faculty , 1983 .
[42] K. O’Meara,et al. Advancing Engaged Scholarship in Promotion and Tenure: A Roadmap and Call for Reform. , 2015 .
[43] R. Dellavalle,et al. The write position , 2007, EMBO reports.
[44] Victor M. H. Borden,et al. Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family? , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[45] Vincent Larivière,et al. The Journal Impact Factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects , 2018, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.
[46] T. L. Tang,et al. Attitudes Toward Research and Teaching: Differences Between Administrators and Faculty Members. , 1997 .
[47] Juan Pablo Alperin,et al. How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? , 2019, eLife.
[48] B. Jordan,et al. More Than Likes and Tweets: Creating Social Media Portfolios for Academic Promotion and Tenure. , 2017, Journal of graduate medical education.
[49] Richard Smith,et al. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006 .
[50] Samuel A. Moore,et al. Erratum: “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence , 2017, Palgrave Communications.
[51] Heather A. Piwowar,et al. Altmetrics: Value all research products , 2013, Nature.
[52] Anatoliy A. Gruzd,et al. Tenure and promotion in the age of online social media , 2011, ASIST.
[53] Bruce Macfarlane,et al. Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy , 2007 .
[54] Ernest L. Boyer,et al. The Scholarship of Engagement. , 1996 .
[55] Emily S. Darling,et al. The role of twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication , 2013, ArXiv.
[56] A. Welton,et al. Assistant professors of color confront the inequitable terrain of academia: a community cultural wealth perspective , 2017 .
[57] A. Goldstein,et al. Community engagement in US and Canadian medical schools , 2011, Advances in medical education and practice.
[58] B. Montgomery,et al. Retention of Underrepresented Minority Faculty: Strategic Initiatives for Institutional Value Proposition Based on Perspectives from a Range of Academic Institutions. , 2015, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.
[59] D. C. May. THE NATURE OF SCHOOL OF EDUCATION FACULTY WORK AND MATERIALS FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE AT A MAJOR RESEARCH UNIVERSITY , 2005 .
[60] L. Claxton,et al. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? , 2005, Mutation research.
[61] Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al. Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[62] D. Lee,et al. Beyond Teaching and Research: Faculty Perceptions of Service Roles at Research Universities , 2016 .
[63] Michael C. Frank,et al. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.
[64] M. Wacha,et al. The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2017 .
[65] Diane Harley,et al. Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 , 2013, New Media Soc..
[66] Peter Taylor,et al. Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.
[67] Gary F. Peters,et al. The Perceived Impact of Journal of Information Systems on Promotion and Tenure , 2015, J. Inf. Syst..
[68] Julie Ellison,et al. Scholarship in Public: Knowledge Creation and Tenure Policy in the Engaged University , 2008 .
[69] M. Soares. Collaborative research in light of the prevailing criteria for promotion and tenure in academia. , 2015, Genomics.
[70] Nadia I. Awad,et al. The Scholarly Merit of Social Media Use Among Clinical Faculty , 2014, The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians.
[71] S. Rijcke,et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.
[72] Harriet Zuckerman,et al. Age, aging, and age structure in science , 1968 .
[73] Hude Quan,et al. Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment , 2010, BMC medical education.
[74] R. Cagan. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.
[75] Robert G. Green,et al. TENURE AND PROMOTION DECISIONS: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND SERVICE , 2008 .
[76] Anton J. Nederhof,et al. Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics , 2008, Scientometrics.
[77] Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al. Research Commentary. Academic Rewards for Teaching, Research, and Service: Data and Discourse , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..
[78] Sanford G. Thatcher. The challenge of open access for university presses , 2007, Learn. Publ..
[79] Jonathan P. Tennant,et al. The state of the art in peer review , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.
[80] Mark A. Fuller,et al. Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..
[81] C. J. King,et al. SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION: ACADEMIC VALUES AND SUSTAINABLE MODELS , 2006 .