Succession management practices in Australian organizations

In order to assess the current usage of succession management programs in Australian‐based organizations, and gain information on the characteristics and perceived effectiveness of such programs, a national research study was undertaken. A total of 711 human resource management professionals from a range of organizations across the country answered the questionnaire, a response rate of 59 percent. Succession management programs were present in less than half of the respondent's organizations. Furthermore, these programs were generally less than five years old. The prime imperatives for introducing succession management programs were reported as the desire to improve business results, and the need for new skill requirements in the business. A relationship between organization size, industry and type and the likelihood to use succession management was found. Common perceptions concerning the characteristics of effective succession management programs were also identified and are described in the paper. In brief, these are: high level involvement by the chief executive officer; senior management support; line management involvement in identifying candidates; developmental assignments as part of the process; and succession management linked to business strategies.

[1]  T. Huang Succession management systems and human resource outcomes , 2001 .

[2]  P. Boxall,et al.  Strategy and Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[3]  L. Donaldson Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[4]  Views from the top: foundation CEOs look at leadership succession , 1997 .

[5]  Stuart Conger Fostering a career development culture: reflections on the roles of managers, employees and supervisors (Поддержка культуры развития карьеры: рефлексия ролей менеджера, служащего и супервизора) , 2002 .

[6]  Y. Baruch Integrated career systems for the 2000s , 1999 .

[7]  W. Boeker,et al.  Organizational performance and adaptation: effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[8]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Corporate Performance and CEO Turnover: The Role of Performance Expectations , 1991 .

[9]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives And Their Effects On Organizations , 1996 .

[10]  E. Kur,et al.  Assuring corporate leadership for the future , 2002 .

[11]  L. Eastman Succession Planning: An Annotated Bibliography and Summary of Commonly Reported Organizational Practices , 1995 .

[12]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Succession as A Sociopolitical Process: Internal Impediments to Outsider Selection , 1993 .

[13]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  Linking Employee Assessments to Succession Planning , 2003 .

[14]  Warren Boeker,et al.  PERFORMANCE AND SUCCESSOR CHOICE: THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF GOVERNANCE AND OWNERSHIP , 1993 .

[15]  J. Conger,et al.  Developing your leadership pipeline. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[16]  E. Schall,et al.  Public-Sector Succession: A Strategic Approach to Sustaining Innovation , 1997 .

[17]  Michael S. Leibman,et al.  Succession Management: The Next Generation of Succession Planning , 1996 .

[18]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Career management practices: An empirical survey and implications , 2000 .

[19]  John Storey,et al.  HRM and its link with strategic management , 2001 .

[20]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Response Rate in Academic Studies — A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  William Rothwell,et al.  Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within , 1994 .

[22]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .