A Cross‐National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss

We used socioeconomic models that included economic inequality to predict biodiversity loss, measured as the proportion of threatened plant and vertebrate species, across 50 countries. Our main goal was to evaluate whether economic inequality, measured as the Gini index of income distribution, improved the explanatory power of our statistical models. We compared four models that included the following: only population density, economic footprint (i.e., the size of the economy relative to the country area), economic footprint and income inequality (Gini index), and an index of environmental governance. We also tested the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, but it was not supported by the data. Statistical comparisons of the models revealed that the model including both economic footprint and inequality was the best predictor of threatened species. It significantly outperformed population density alone and the environmental governance model according to the Akaike information criterion. Inequality was a significant predictor of biodiversity loss and significantly improved the fit of our models. These results confirm that socioeconomic inequality is an important factor to consider when predicting rates of anthropogenic biodiversity loss.

[1]  S. Babones,et al.  Standardized Income Inequality Data for Use in Cross‐National Research , 2007 .

[2]  D. Klooster Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico. , 2000 .

[3]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[4]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Jean-Philippe Platteau,et al.  The Ambiguous Impact of Inequality on Local Resource Management , 1999 .

[6]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[7]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[8]  J. Asafu-Adjaye BIODIVERSITY LOSS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, A CROSS COUNTRY ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[9]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss , 2007, PloS one.

[10]  J. Lynch,et al.  Metropolitan income inequality and working-age mortality: A cross-sectional analysis using comparable data from five countries , 2005, Journal of Urban Health.

[11]  S. Bowles,et al.  Inequality, Cooperation, and Environmental Sustainability , 2018 .

[12]  E. Boserup The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure , 1966 .

[13]  P. Ehrlich The Population Bomb. , 1962, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[14]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Erich Barke,et al.  Hierarchical partitioning , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[16]  Ralph Mac Nally,et al.  Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[18]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity , 2006 .

[19]  R. M. Nally Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[20]  D. Stern The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2004 .

[21]  Branko Milanovic,et al.  Worlds Apart: Measuring international and global inequality , 2006 .

[22]  Jeff Dayton-Johnson,et al.  Inequality and Conservation on the Local Commons: A Theoretical Exercise , 2002 .

[23]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[25]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[26]  J. Boyce Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation , 1994 .

[27]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  G. Myles,et al.  In praise of inequality: public good provision and income distribution , 1997 .

[29]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  REFORMULATING THE COMMONS , 2000 .

[30]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Effects of Economic Prosperity on Numbers of Threatened Species , 2001 .

[31]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection , 2004 .

[32]  D. Tilman Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[33]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[34]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[35]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[36]  G. Squires,et al.  The politics of preventable deaths: local spending, income inequality, and premature mortality in US cities , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.