Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using data and rate adaptive lossy compression

A novel technique for despeckling the medical ultrasound images using lossy compression is presented. The logarithm of the input image is first transformed to the multiscale wavelet domain. It is then shown that the subband coefficients of the log-transformed ultrasound image can be successfully modeled using the generalized Laplacian distribution. Based on this modeling, a simple adaptation of the zero-zone and reconstruction levels of the uniform threshold quantizer is proposed in order to achieve simultaneous despeckling and quantization. This adaptation is based on: 1) an estimate of the corrupting speckle noise level in the image; 2) the estimated statistics of the noise-free subband coefficients; and 3) the required compression rate. The Laplacian distribution is considered as a special case of the generalized Laplacian distribution and its efficacy is demonstrated for the problem under consideration. Context-based classification is also applied to the noisy coefficients to enhance the performance of the subband coder. Simulation results using a contrast detail phantom image and several real ultrasound images are presented. To validate the performance of the proposed scheme, comparison with two two-stage schemes, wherein the speckled image is first filtered and then compressed using the state-of-the-art JPEG2000 encoder, is presented. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme works better, both in terms of the signal to noise ratio and the visual quality.

[1]  Chrysostomos L. Nikias,et al.  Scalar quantisation of heavy-tailed signals , 2000 .

[2]  Nariman Farvardin,et al.  Optimum quantizer performance for a class of non-Gaussian memoryless sources , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Eve A. Riskin,et al.  Optimal bit allocation via the generalized BFOS algorithm , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Bridging Compression to Wavelet Thresholding as a Denoising Method , 1997 .

[6]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[7]  Yair Shoham,et al.  Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers [speech coding] , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Noise removal via Bayesian wavelet coring , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[10]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Jelena Kovacevic,et al.  Wavelets and Subband Coding , 2013, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series.

[12]  Jerome M. Shapiro,et al.  Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Bin Yu,et al.  Wavelet thresholding via MDL for natural images , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  J C Bamber,et al.  Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images. , 1986, Ultrasonics.

[15]  Antonio Ortega,et al.  Adaptive quantization of image subbands with efficient overhead rate selection , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  D. L. Donoho,et al.  Ideal spacial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[18]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Joint Compression and Speckle Reduction of SAR Images using Embedded Zerotree Models , 1996 .

[20]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Balas K. Natarajan Filtering random noise from deterministic signals via data compression , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Complexity-regularized image denoising , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[23]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  J. Rissanen Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry Theory , 1989 .

[25]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[26]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage , 1995 .

[27]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  Comparison of different methods of classification in subband coding of images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[28]  P. Shankar A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues , 2000 .

[29]  Göran Salomonsson,et al.  Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[30]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[31]  A. Said,et al.  Manuscript Submitted to the Ieee Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology a New Fast and Eecient Image Codec Based on Set Partitioning in Hierarchical Trees , 2007 .

[32]  Antonio Ortega,et al.  Image subband coding using context-based classification and adaptive quantization , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[33]  Dong Wei,et al.  Simultaneous noise reduction and SAR image data compression using best wavelet packet basis , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.