Processing of semantic anomaly by right and left hemispheres of commissurotomy patients. Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

The ability of 5 commissurotomized patients to appreciate semantic anomalies presented to their right and left hemispheres was tested using both electrophysiological and behavioural measures. In all cases, the patients heard sentence fragments that were completed either by semantically congruous or incongruous words briefly flashed to the left visual field, right visual field or to both fields simultaneously. A dissociation between behavioural and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures was observed. All 5 patients were able to indicate by a pointing response with greater than chance accuracy whether the terminal word of a sentence made sense (i.e., appropriate for the context) or was nonsensical. This was true regardless of the hemisphere receiving the terminal word. Likewise, all the patients responded to right visual field anomalies with a cerebral potential (N400) that was typically elicited by such words in control subjects. In contrast, only those 2 patients who developed an overt speech capability under the control of the right hemisphere produced N400 waves in response to left visual field anomalies. These findings were interpreted as suggesting possible relationships within language generation and semantic priming.

[1]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  The Integrated Mind , 1978, Springer US.

[2]  D. Stuss,et al.  Event-related potentials during naming and mental rotation. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Insup Taylor,et al.  Content and structure in sentence production , 1969 .

[4]  William Hirst,et al.  Profiles of right hemisphere language and speech following brain bisection , 1984, Brain and Language.

[5]  M. Kutas.  Event related brain potential studies of language , 1988 .

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[8]  D. Baxter.  Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Cognitive Studies of Phonological Reading , 1987 .

[9]  R. Sperry.  Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[10]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task , 1982, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Rugg.  The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[12]  David W. Roberts,et al.  Neurologic Perspectives on Right Hemisphere Language Following Surgical Section of the Corpus Callosum , 1984 .

[13]  Donald G. Childers,et al.  Brain potentials during sentence verification: Late negativity and long-term memory strength , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Perceptual, semantic and phonetic aspects of elementary language processes in split-brain patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  J E Bogen,et al.  Cerebral commissurotomy. A second case report. , 1965, JAMA.

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words , 1986 .

[17]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  “Central” commissurotomy for intractable generalized epilepsy , 1982, Neurology.

[18]  H. Weinberg,et al.  Brain potentials, perceptual mechanisms and semantic categorisation , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[20]  G. Ojemann.  Ojemann's data: Provocative but mysterious , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  E. Halgren,et al.  Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[23]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of apparent motion by commissurotomy patients , 1986, Nature.

[25]  J. Boddy,et al.  Event-related potentials in chronometric analysis of primed word recognition with different stimulus onset asynchronies. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[26]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Right hemisphere language following brain bisection. A 20-year perspective. , 1983, American Psychologist.

[27]  M. Gazzaniga.  Perceptual and attentional processes following callosal section in humans , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Bernard Renault,et al.  7 The Visual Emitted Potentials: Clues for Information Processing , 1983 .

[30]  A. Lambert.  Right hemisphere language ability: 2. Evidence from normal subjects , 1982 .

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[32]  J. Charney,et al.  Aphasia and Associated Disorders: Taxonomy, Localization, and Recovery , 1981 .

[33]  R W Sperry,et al.  Reception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  A. Lambert.  Right hemisphere language ability: 1. Clinical evidence , 1982 .

[35]  H J Keselman,et al.  Repeated measures F tests and psychophysiological research: controlling the number of false positives. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[36]  D. Benson,et al.  The Dual brain : hemispheric specialization in humans , 1985 .

[37]  G. Marsh,et al.  Differences in the late components of the event-related potential due to age and to semantic and non-semantic tasks. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Aphasia and Associated Disorders: Taxonomy, Localization and Recovery , 1979 .

[39]  M. Kutas,et al.  The lateral distribution of event-related potentials during sentence processing , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  U. Norrsell,et al.  Vocalization possibly initiated by the Minor Hemisphere , 1968, Nature.

[41]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Cerebral commissurotomy for control of intractable seizures , 1977, Neurology.

[42]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[43]  E. Zaidel.  READING BY THE DISCONNECTED RIGHT HEMISPHERE: AN APHASIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE , 1982 .

[44]  Larry E. Johnson.  Bilateral visual cross-integration by human forebrain commissurotomy subjects , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  J. Sergent.  Unified response to bilateral hemispheric stimulation by a split-brain patient , 1983, Nature.

[46]  A Kok,et al.  ERPs associated with language and hemispheric specialization. A review. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[47]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[48]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[49]  B Milner,et al.  THE ROLE OF EARLY LEFT‐BRAIN INJURY IN DETERMINING LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH FUNCTIONS , 1977, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  S. Farmer,et al.  The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[51]  Derek Besner,et al.  Is the right hemisphere literate , 1984 .

[52]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Language and speech capacity of the right hemisphere. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Walter Ritter,et al.  Tutorials in event related potential research : endogenous components , 1983 .

[54]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Plasticity in speech organization following commissurotomy. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Speech without conscious awareness , 1987, Neurology.

[56]  Jeffrey D. Holtzman,et al.  Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: Evidence from human commissurotomy patients , 1984, Vision Research.

[57]  M. Kutas,et al.  A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[58]  Larry E. Johnson.  Vocal responses to left visual stimuli following forebrain commissurotomy , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  M. Gazzaniga.  Right hemisphere language following brain bisection. A 20-year perspective. , 1983, The American psychologist.

[60]  Right hemisphere language: insights into normal language mechanisms? , 1988, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[61]  L. Henderson.  Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[62]  M. Gazzaniga.  The Bisected Brain , 1970 .

[63]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing , 1981, Brain and Language.

[64]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[65]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[66]  J. Sergent.  Subcortical coordination of hemisphere activity in commissurotomized patients. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.