Physical activity for the over-65s: could it be a cost-effective exercise for the NHS?

BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in the health-promoting potential of physical activity in older adults. The objective of this study was to estimate the likely costs, health benefits and consequences for the National Health Service which might result from a publicly funded programme of regular exercise made available to a population of 10,000 people over the age of 65. METHODS Risk education data from observational studies were used to calculate the possible impact of a community-based programme of activity on hospital admissions and deaths from coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, femoral neck fractures and mental disorders. The avoided costs of health care and net cost per life-year saved were estimated. RESULTS Providing twice-weekly exercise classes for 10,000 participants would cost approximately 854,700 pounds per year, but would prevent 76 deaths and 230 in-patient episodes, avoiding annual health care costs of approximately 601,000 pounds. Assuming the mean expectation of life after 65 to be ten years, the programme would cost about 330 pounds per life-year saved. Under a range of more extreme assumptions, the cost per life-year saved would vary from 100 pounds to 1500 pounds. CONCLUSIONS A publicly funded programme of regular moderate exercise for over-65-year-olds could achieve important health benefits at relatively low cost. The estimates provided by this analysis should now be tested in a rigorous randomized trial, and health commissioners should begin to think of purchasing exercise programmes alongside other health-promoting measures.

[1]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  A controlled trial of physical training after myocardial infarction. Effects on risk factors, nonfatal reinfarction, and death. , 1975, Preventive medicine.

[2]  D. Allan Medical Aspects of Exercise: Benefits and risks , 1992 .

[3]  Jeremy N. Morris,et al.  Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Prescribing exercise in general practice , 1994, BMJ.

[5]  P. Fentem,et al.  The new case for exercise : a statement prepared for the Sports Council and the Health Education Authority , 1988 .

[6]  M. Drummond,et al.  Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes , 1988 .

[7]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Group- vs home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women. A community-based clinical trial. , 1991, JAMA.

[8]  S. Camp,et al.  Cardiovascular complications of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs. , 1986, JAMA.

[9]  M. Mcmurdo,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of exercise in the elderly. , 1992, Gerontology.

[10]  E H Wagner,et al.  Effects of physical activity on health status in older adults. II. Intervention studies. , 1992, Annual review of public health.

[11]  E. Larson,et al.  Benefits of exercise for older adults. A review of existing evidence and current recommendations for the general population. , 1992, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[12]  Elward Ks,et al.  Participation by sedentary elderly persons in an exercise promotion session. , 1992 .

[13]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Prescribing exercise in general practice , 1994, BMJ.

[14]  E H Wagner,et al.  Effects of physical activity on health status in older adults. I: Observational studies. , 1992, Annual review of public health.

[15]  Rachel Jenkins Health of the nation. , 1969, British medical journal.

[16]  Mark Sculpher,et al.  Economic Evaluation in Health Care Research and Development: Undertake it Early and Often , 1995 .

[17]  P. Fentem The New Case for Exercise , 1989 .