Potential individual versus simultaneous climate change effects on soybean (C 3 ) and maize (C 4 ) crops: An agrotechnology model based study

Landuse/landcover change induced effects on regional weather and climate patterns and the associated plant response or agricultural productivity are coupled processes. Some of the basic responses to climate change can be detected via changes in radiation (R), precipitation (P), and temperature (T). Past studies indicate that each of these three variables can affect LCLUC response and the agricultural productivity. This study seeks to address the following question: What is the effect of individual versus simultaneous changes in R, P, and Ton plant response such as crop yields in a C3 and a C4 plant? This question is addressed by conducting model experiments for soybean (C3) and maize (C4) crops using the DSSAT: Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer, CROPGRO (soybean), and CERES-Maize (maize) models. These models were configured over an agricultural experiment station in Clayton, NC [35.65°N, 78.5°W]. Observed weather and field conditions corresponding to 1998 were used as the control. In the first set of experiments, the CROPGRO (soybean) and CERES-Maize (maize) responses to individual changes in R and P (25%, 50%, 75%, 150%) and T (±1, ±2 °C) with respect to control were studied. In the second set, R, P, and T were simultaneously changed by 50%, 150%, and ±2 °C, and the interactions and direct effects of individual versus simultaneous variable changes were analyzed. For the model setting and the prescribed environmental changes, results from the first set of experiments indicate: (i) precipitation changes were most sensitive and directly affected yield and water loss due to evapotranspiration; (ii) radiation changes had a non-linear effect and were not as prominent as precipitation changes; (iii) temperature had a limited impact and the response was non-linear; (iv) soybeans and maize responded differently for R, P, and T, with maize being more sensitive. The results from the second set of experiments indicate that simultaneous change analyses do not necessarily agree with those from individual changes, particularly for temperature changes. Our analysis indicates that for the changing climate, precipitation (hydrological), temperature, and radiative feedbacks show a non-linear effect on yield. Study results also indicate that for studying the feedback between the land surface and the atmospheric changes, (i) there is a need for performing simultaneous parameter changes in the response assessment of cropping patterns and crop yield based on ensembles of projected climate change, and (ii) C3 crops are generally considered more sensitive than C4; however, the temperature–radiation related changes shown in this study also effected significant changes in C4 crops. Future studies assessing LCLUC impacts, including

[1]  R. Pielke,et al.  A new paradigm for assessing the role of agriculture in the climate system and in climate change , 2007 .

[2]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[3]  G. Edwards,et al.  Temperature Dependence of the Linkage of Quantum Yield of Photosystem II to CO2 Fixation in C4 and C3 Plants , 1993, Plant physiology.

[4]  Pinhas Alpert,et al.  Factor Separation in Numerical Simulations. , 1993 .

[5]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[6]  James W. Jones,et al.  El Niño–Southern Oscillation Impacts on Winter Vegetable Production in Florida* , 1999 .

[7]  M. Kirschbaum.  The sensitivity of C3 photosynthesis to increasing CO2 concentration: a theoretical analysis of its dependence on temperature and background CO2 concentration , 1994 .

[8]  Larry W. Thomason,et al.  Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations , 2002 .

[9]  Norman J. Rosenberg,et al.  Adaptation of agriculture to climate change , 1992 .

[10]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[11]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Cold Tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus: Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C4 Photosynthetic Enzymes1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[12]  Clyde W. Fraisse,et al.  Site-specific evaluation of the CROPGRO-soybean model on Missouri claypan soils , 2003 .

[13]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology , 1998, Oecologia.

[14]  K. Alapaty,et al.  Uncertainty in the Specification of Surface Characteristics, Part ii: Hierarchy of Interaction-Explicit Statistical Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  C. A. van Diepen,et al.  Effects of climate change on grain maize yield potential in the european community , 1995 .

[16]  C. Reid,et al.  Elevated CO2 reduces O3 flux and O3-induced yield losses in soybeans: possible implications for elevated CO2 studies , 1997 .

[17]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[18]  R. Schulze,et al.  Global Climate Change and Agricultural Productivity in Southern Africa: Thought for Food and Food for Thought , 1996 .

[19]  Jay M. Ham,et al.  Fluxes of CO2 and water vapor from a prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1995 .

[20]  Linda O. Mearns,et al.  The effect of changes in daily and interannual climatic variability on CERES-Wheat: A sensitivity study , 1996 .

[21]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Response of a Deciduous Forest to the Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis , 2003, Science.

[22]  R. Cesar Izaurralde,et al.  Integrated assessment of Hadley Center (HadCM2) climate-change impacts on agricultural productivity and irrigation water supply in the conterminous United States: Part II. Regional agricultural production in 2030 and 2095 , 2003 .

[23]  B. McCarl,et al.  The Uncertainty due to Spatial Scale of Climate Scenarios in Integrated Assessments: An Example from U.S. Agriculture , 2004 .

[24]  Roberta A. Brown,et al.  Sensitivity of crop yield and water use to change in a range of climatic factors and CO2 concentrations: a simulation study applying EPIC to the central USA , 1997 .

[25]  Mary W. Downton,et al.  Response of Soybean and Sorghum to Varying Spatial Scales of Climate Change Scenarios in the Southeastern United States , 2003 .

[26]  J. Wolf.  Comparison of two potato simulation models under climate change. II Application of climate change scenarios. , 2002 .

[27]  EFFECTS OF SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET-B RADIATION, TEMPERATURE AND CO2 ON GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGY OF SUNFLOWER AND MAIZE SEEDLINGS , 1997 .

[28]  D. G. Rao,et al.  Consequences of future climate change and changing climate variability on maize yields in the midwestern United States , 2000 .

[29]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Nitrogen Response of Leaf Photosynthesis and Canopy Radiation Use Efficiency in Field-Grown Maize and Sorghum , 1994 .

[30]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[31]  James W. Jones,et al.  RESPONSE OF CROP YIELD TO PREDICTED CHANGES IN CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC CO2 USING SIMULATION , 1990 .

[32]  Walter W. Heck,et al.  Ultraviolet-B radiation and ozone effects on growth, yield, and photosynthesis of soybean , 1994 .

[33]  James W. Jones,et al.  Modeling Growth, Development, and Yield of Grain Legumes using Soygro, Pnutgro, and Beangro: A Review , 1992 .

[34]  R. Bruce Curry,et al.  Agricultural Systems modeting and Simulation , 1997 .

[35]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Climate change in Asia: A review of the vulnerability and adaptation of crop production , 1996, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[36]  James W. Jones,et al.  Evaluation of the CROPGRO-Soybean model over a wide range of experiments , 1997 .

[37]  L. Erda,et al.  The impacts of potential climate change and climate variability on simulated maize production in China , 1996, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[38]  C. Hays,et al.  Comparison of Agricultural Impacts of Climate Change Calculated from High and Low Resolution Climate Change Scenarios: Part II. Accounting for Adaptation and CO2 Direct Effects , 2001 .

[39]  S. Idso,et al.  Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: a review of the past 10 years' research , 1994 .

[40]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Seed Yield after Environmental Stress in Soybean Grown under Elevated CO2 , 1999 .

[41]  R. Gifford,et al.  Elevated CO2 Effects on Water Use and Growth of Maize in Wet and Drying Soil , 1996 .

[42]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  Direct and Indirect Climate Change Effects on Photosynthesis and Transpiration , 2004, Plant biology.

[43]  Vijaya Gopal Kakani,et al.  Simulating the impacts of climate change on cotton production in the Mississippi Delta , 2002 .

[44]  James W. Jones,et al.  POTENTIAL USES AND LIMITATIONS OF CROP MODELS , 1996 .

[45]  M. Agrawal,et al.  Influence of elevated CO(2) on the sensitivity of two soybean cultivars to sulphur dioxide. , 2001, Environmental and experimental botany.

[46]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Vulnerability and adaptation assessments of agriculturalcrops under climate change in the Southeastern USA , 2000 .

[47]  R. Betts,et al.  The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[48]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  The regional effects of CO2 and landscape change using a coupled plant and meteorological model , 2001 .

[49]  S. C. Liu,et al.  Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to enhance crop yields in China through emission controls? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Kenneth J. Boote,et al.  Development of a Leaf-Level Canopy Assimilation Model for CERES-Maize , 2005 .

[51]  R. Biggs,et al.  Stratospheric Ozone Depletion/UV-B Radiation in the Biosphere , 1994, NATO ASI Series.

[52]  Joost Wolf,et al.  Comparison of two soya bean simulation models under climate change : I Model calibration and sensitivity analyses , 2002 .

[53]  A. Robock,et al.  Potential effects of global climatic change on the phenology and yield of maize in venezuela , 1995 .

[54]  Joseph E. Miller,et al.  IS UV-B A HAZARD TO SOYBEAN PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND YIELD? RESULTS OF AN OZONE-UV-B INTERACTION STUDY AND MODEL PREDICTIONS , 1994 .