Artificial Cambered-Wing for a Beetle-Mimicking Flapper

In this paper, we have attempted to improve the aerodynamic force generation ability of an artificial wing by implementing initial wing camber in the flexible artificial wing. This initial camber is used to create passive wing camber during flapping motion. We modified original artificial wing by removing many minor vein structures in the wing and then placed the initial camber between two major veins. Stiffness measurements for the original artificial wing and the present wing with initial camber were conducted to compare the stiffnesses of the two artificial wings, and the similarities of the two wings are discussed. A flapping test was carried out using a previously-built flapper that can flap at higher than 25 Hz flapping frequency to verify the wing camber effect. Finally, a performance comparison between uncambered- and cambered-wings was also undertaken based on observations using a high-speed camera and force measurements from wired-flight tests and swing tests. The comparison showed that the cambered-wing could produce about 10% higher thrust than the uncambered-wing.

[1]  J K Shang,et al.  Artificial insect wings of diverse morphology for flapping-wing micro air vehicles , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications , 2001 .

[3]  C. W. Berry,et al.  A cyborg beetle: Insect flight control through an implantable, tetherless microsystem , 2008, 2008 IEEE 21st International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[4]  Hoon Cheol Park,et al.  Measurement of Force Produced by an Insect-Mimicking Flapping-Wing System , 2010 .

[5]  C. Ellington.  The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Akira Azuma,et al.  The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming, Second Edition , 2006 .

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[8]  B. Tobalske,et al.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird , 2005, Nature.

[9]  D. Pines,et al.  Challenges Facing Future Micro-Air-Vehicle Development , 2006 .

[10]  Sanjay P Sane,et al.  The aerodynamics of insect flight , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  C. W. Berry,et al.  Radio-Controlled Cyborg Beetles: A Radio-Frequency System for Insect Neural Flight Control , 2009, 2009 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[12]  Akira Azuma,et al.  The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming , 1992 .

[13]  Hoon Cheol Park,et al.  Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight , 2010 .

[14]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[15]  C. Rees.  Form and function in corrugated insect wings , 1975, Nature.

[16]  Jin Hwan Ko,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of beetle flight , 2009, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[17]  C. Rees.  Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared , 1975, Nature.

[18]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.