Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol

Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an intervention used in cases of cardiac arrest to revive patients whose heart has stopped. Because cardiac arrest can have potentially devastating outcomes such as severe neurological deficits even if CPR is performed, patients must be involved in determining in advance if they want CPR in the case of an unexpected arrest. Shared decision making (SDM) facilitates discussions about goals of care regarding CPR in intensive care units (ICUs). Patient decision aids (DAs) are proven to support the implementation of SDM. Many patient DAs about CPR exist, but they are not universally implemented in ICUs in part due to lack of context and cultural adaptation. Adaptation to local context is an important phase of implementing any type of knowledge tool such as patient DAs. User-centered design supported by a wiki platform to perform rapid prototyping has previously been successful in creating knowledge tools adapted to the needs of patients and health professionals (eg, asthma action plans). This project aims to explore how user-centered design and a wiki platform can support the adaptation of an existing DA for CPR to the local context. Objective The primary objective is to use an existing DA about CPR to create a wiki-based DA that is adapted to the context of a single ICU and tailorable to individual patient’s risk factors while employing user-centered design. The secondary objective is to document the use of a wiki platform for the adaptation of patient DAs. Methods This study will be conducted in a mixed surgical and medical ICU at Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Quebec, Canada. We plan to involve all 5 intensivists and recruit at least 20 alert and oriented patients admitted to the ICU and their family members if available. In the first phase of this study, we will observe 3 weeks of daily interactions between patients, families, intensivists, and other allied health professionals. We will specifically observe 5 dyads of attending intensivists and alert and oriented patients discussing goals of care concerning CPR to understand how a patient DA could support this decision. We will also conduct individual interviews with the 5 intensivists to identify their needs concerning the implementation of a DA. In the second phase of the study, we will build a first prototype based on the needs identified in Phase I. We will start by translating an existing DA entitled “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a decision aid for patients and their families.” We will then adapt this tool to the needs we identified in Phase I and archive this first prototype in a wiki. Building on the wiki’s programming architecture, we intend to integrate the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation risk calculator into our DA to determine personal risks and benefits of CPR for each patient. We will then present the first prototype to 5 new patient-intensivist dyads. Feedback about content and visual presentation will be collected from the intensivists through short interviews while longer interviews will be conducted with patients and their family members to inform the visual design and content of the next prototype. After each rapid prototyping cycle, 2 researchers will perform qualitative content analysis of data collected through interviews and direct observations. We will attempt to solve all content and visual design issues identified before moving to the next round of prototyping. In all, we will conduct 3 prototyping cycles with a total of 15 patient-intensivist dyads. Results We expect to develop a multimedia wiki-based DA to support goals of care discussions about CPR adapted to the local needs of patients, their family members, and intensivists and tailorable to individual patient risk factors. The final version of the DA as well as the development process will be housed in an open-access wiki and free to be adapted and used in other contexts. Conclusions This study will shed new light on the development of DAs adapted to local context and tailorable to individual patient risk factors employing user-centered design and a wiki to support rapid prototyping of content and visual design issues.

[1]  Samia M. Alhabib,et al.  Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review , 2015, Implementation Science.

[2]  Holly O Witteman,et al.  User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[3]  Anna R Gagliardi,et al.  The development of guideline implementation tools: a qualitative study. , 2015, CMAJ open.

[4]  France Légaré,et al.  Development and Validation of Questionnaires Exploring Health Care Professionals' Intention to Use Wiki-Based Reminders to Promote Best Practices in Trauma , 2014, JMIR research protocols.

[5]  R. Thomson,et al.  Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M. Faber,et al.  Wikis to facilitate patient participation in developing information leaflets: first experiences , 2014, Informatics for health & social care.

[8]  P. Pronovost Enhancing physicians' use of clinical guidelines. , 2013, JAMA.

[9]  M. Ebell,et al.  Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[10]  France Légaré,et al.  Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  R. Fowler,et al.  End-of-life care in Canada. , 2013, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[12]  M. Murray,et al.  Interventions for shared decision-making about life support in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. , 2013, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[13]  Peter L. Elkin,et al.  Human Factors Engineering in HI: So What? Who Cares? and What's in It for You? , 2012, Healthcare informatics research.

[14]  France Légaré,et al.  Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Time to accelerate integration of human factors and ergonomics in patient safety , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[16]  P. Archambault WikiBuild: A New Application to Support Patient and Health Care Professional Involvement in the Development of Patient Support Tools , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  WikiBuild: A New Online Collaboration Process For Multistakeholder Tool Development and Consensus Building , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  J. Crisp,et al.  Practice guidelines need to address the ‘how’ and the ‘what’ of implementation , 2011, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[19]  Matt Vassar,et al.  Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions an Overview of Ethnography in Healthcare and Medical Education Research , 2022 .

[20]  M. Johantgen,et al.  Factors associated with treatment restriction orders and hospice in older nursing home residents. , 2011, Journal of clinical nursing.

[21]  Laurent Papazian,et al.  Long-term outcome in medical patients aged 80 or over following admission to an intensive care unit , 2011, Critical care.

[22]  M. Searl,et al.  It is time to talk about people: a human-centered healthcare system , 2010, Health research policy and systems.

[23]  France Légaré,et al.  Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[24]  D. Heyland,et al.  Development and use of a decision aid for communication with hospitalized patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  France Légaré,et al.  Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[27]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Knowledge Translation in Health Care , 2009 .

[28]  S. Straus,et al.  Knowledge translation in health care : moving from evidence to practice , 2009 .

[29]  G. Eysenbach Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  R. McLean,et al.  The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[31]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[33]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[34]  P G Shekelle,et al.  Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. , 2000, Health services research.

[35]  J Lomas,et al.  Evaluating the Message: The Relationship Between Compliance Rate and the Subject of a Practice Guideline , 1994, Medical care.