Measurement of Transformational Leadership and its Relationship with Team Cohesion and Performance Level

The present study explored the construct validity of a Differentiated Transformational Leadership Inventory and its relationship with team cohesion and performance level. Three hundred and nine club standard ultimate Frisbee players in the United Kingdom (mean age = 24.30 years, SD = 3.90) completed an adapted version of Hardy, Arthur, Jones, Shariff, Munnoch, Isaacs, and Allsopp et al.'s (in press) Differentiated Transformational Leadership Inventory and the Group Environment Questionnaire (Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed evidence for the factorial and discriminant validity of the leadership inventory. Furthermore, results demonstrated that the leadership behaviors of fostering acceptance of group goals and promoting team work, high performance expectations, and individual consideration significantly predicted task cohesion; and fostering acceptance of group goals and promoting teamwork significantly predicted social cohesion. Performance level moderated these relationships. These results are discussed with reference to the conceptualization and measurement of transformational leadership, and how coaches’ leadership behaviors may influence cohesion depending on the level of athletes’ performance.

[1]  S. Biddle,et al.  Research methods in sport and exercise psychology: quantitative and qualitative issues , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  P. Barrett Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  M. Hellard,et al.  Registered post achieved a higher response rate than normal mail--a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Joyce E. Bono,et al.  Transformational Leadership, Job Characteristics, and Organizational Citizenship Performance , 2006 .

[6]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  E. Stodel Literature Reviews in Sport Psychology , 2007 .

[8]  D. Gould,et al.  A Survey of U.S. Atlanta and Nagano Olympians: Variables Perceived to Influence Performance , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  D. Yukelson Principles of effective team building interventions in sport: A direct services approach at Penn State University , 1997 .

[10]  D. Feltz,et al.  Do Coaches’ Efficacy Expectations for Their Teams Predict Team Performance? , 1997 .

[11]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[12]  M. Eys,et al.  Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: the group environment questionnaire. , 2007, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[13]  D. Feltz,et al.  The Relationship between Intrateam Conflict and Cohesion within Hockey Teams , 2001 .

[14]  M. Griffin,et al.  Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions , 2004 .

[15]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Sports Performance: The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation' , 2001 .

[16]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[17]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[18]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[19]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Development and effects of transformational leadership in adolescents. , 2000 .

[20]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Athletic Maturity and Preferred Leadership , 1983 .

[21]  W. Widmeyer,et al.  The Influence of the Group and Its Cohesiveness on Perceptions of Group Goal-Related Variables , 1993 .

[22]  B. Avolio,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2002 .

[23]  유화자 기독교 사역과 Leadership , 1997 .

[24]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead , 2002 .

[25]  D. Gould,et al.  Psychological Characteristics and Their Development in Olympic Champions , 2002 .

[26]  Dov Eden,et al.  Pygmalion versus self-expectancy: Effects of instructor- and self-expectancy on trainee performance. , 1982 .

[27]  S. Jowett,et al.  An Investigation Into the Impact of Coach Leadership and Coach-Athlete Relationship on Group Cohesion. , 2004 .

[28]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[29]  B. Bass,et al.  Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Procedures and principles of sport psychological assessment. , 2003 .

[31]  Joan L. Duda,et al.  Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement , 1998 .

[32]  D. Jung,et al.  The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings , 2003 .

[33]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. , 2002 .

[34]  James A Welker,et al.  Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutions. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[35]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[36]  J. H. Steiger Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , 1980 .

[37]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Problems with the pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions , 2000 .

[38]  J. Rowold Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Martial Arts , 2006 .

[39]  D. Markland The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling , 2007 .

[40]  S. Carless,et al.  Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behaviour as measured by the MLQ , 1998 .

[41]  B. L. Bredemeier,et al.  The Relationship between Perceived Coaching Behaviors and Team Cohesion among Baseball and Softball Players , 1996 .

[42]  J. McCormick,et al.  Leadership and Individual Principal-Teacher Relationships in Schools , 2004 .

[43]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[44]  Dale N. Glaser,et al.  Jiving the Four-Step, Waltzing Around Factor Analysis, and Other Serious Fun , 2000 .

[45]  B. Avolio,et al.  Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. , 2003 .

[46]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[47]  Judy Donovan,et al.  Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations , 2010 .

[48]  N. Holt,et al.  Guidelines for Delivering Personal-Disclosure Mutual-Sharing Team Building Interventions , 2006 .

[49]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Group dynamics in sport , 2005 .

[50]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[51]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Cohesiveness as a Factor in Sport Performance , 1981 .

[52]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Effects of Transformational Leadership Training on Attitudinal and Financial Outcomes: A Field Experiment , 1996 .

[53]  N. Holt,et al.  An ethnographic study of cohesiveness in a college soccer team over a season. , 2001 .

[54]  S. D. Saleh,et al.  Preferred leadership in sports. , 1978 .

[55]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[56]  M. Beauchamp,et al.  Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Exercise-related Self-efficacy , 2007, Journal of health psychology.