Evaluating the performance of DCOP algorithms in a real world, dynamic problem

Complete algorithms have been proposed to solve problems modelled as distributed constraint optimization (DCOP). However, there are only few attempts to address real world scenarios using this formalism, mainly because of the complexity associated with those algorithms. In the present work we compare three complete algorithms for DCOP, aiming at studying how they perform in complex and dynamic scenarios of increasing sizes. In order to assess their performance we measure not only standard quantities such as number of cycles to arrive to a solution, size and quantity of exchanged messages, but also computing time and quality of the solution which is related to the particular domain we use. This study can shed light in the issues of how the algorithms perform when applied to problems other than those reported in the literature (graph coloring, meeting scheduling, and distributed sensor network).

[1]  Peter Stone,et al.  Multiagent traffic management: a reservation-based intersection control mechanism , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[2]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  ITSUMO: an Intelligent Transportation System for Urban Mobility , 2004, AAMAS '06.

[4]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A Multivariable Regulator Approach to Traffic-Responsive Network-Wide Signal Control , 2000 .

[5]  Boi Faltings,et al.  A Scalable Method for Multiagent Constraint Optimization , 2005, IJCAI.

[6]  Paulo Martins Engel,et al.  Dealing with non-stationary environments using context detection , 2006, ICML.

[7]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  A Swarm-Based Approach for Selection of Signal Plans in Urban Scenarios , 2004, ANTS Workshop.

[8]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents , 2005, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[9]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Solving distributed constraint optimization problems using cooperative mediation , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[10]  Koby Crammer,et al.  Learning from Multiple Sources , 2006, NIPS.

[11]  R D Bretherton,et al.  SCOOT-a Traffic Responsive Method of Coordinating Signals , 1981 .

[12]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Taking DCOP to the real world: efficient complete solutions for distributed multi-event scheduling , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[13]  Wang,et al.  Review of road traffic control strategies , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A multivariable regulator approach to traffic-responsive network-wide signal control , 2000 .

[15]  Kenneth G Courage,et al.  TRANSYT-7F USER'S MANUAL , 1984 .

[16]  P R Lowrie,et al.  The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic system - principles, methodology, algorithms , 1982 .

[17]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Using cooperative mediation to coordinate traffic lights: a case study , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[19]  Boi Faltings,et al.  MB-DPOP: A New Memory-Bounded Algorithm for Distributed Optimization , 2007, IJCAI.

[20]  Eduardo Camponogara,et al.  Distributed Learning Agents in Urban Traffic Control , 2003, EPIA.

[21]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  The Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem: Formalization and Algorithms , 1998, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[22]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  Examining DCSP coordination tradeoffs , 2006, AAMAS '06.