Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes.

BACKGROUND Although an inverse relation between physician caseload and complications has been conclusively demonstrated for several surgical procedures, such data are lacking for percutaneous coronary intervention, and the ACC/AHA guidelines requiring > or = 75 cases per year for operator "competency" are considered by some physicians to be arbitrary. METHODS AND RESULTS From quality-controlled databases at five high-volume centers, models predictive of death and the composite outcome of death, Q-wave infarction, or emergency bypass surgery were developed from 12,985 consecutively treated patients during 1993 through 1994. Models had moderate to high discriminative capacity (area under ROC curves, 0.65 to 0.85), were well calibrated, and were not overfitted by standard tests. These models were used for risk adjustment, and the relations between both yearly caseload and years of interventional experience and the two adverse outcome measures were explored for all 38 physicians with > or = 30 cases per year. The average physician performed a mean +/- SD of 163 +/- 24 cases per year and had been practicing angioplasty for 8 +/- 5 years. Risk-adjusted measures of both death and the composite adverse outcome were inversely related to the number of cases each operator performed annually but bore no relation to total years of experience. Both adverse outcomes were more closely related to the logarithm of caseload (for death, r = .37, P = .01; for death, Q-wave infarction, or bypass surgery, r = .58, P < .001) than to linear caseload. CONCLUSIONS In this analysis, high-volume operators had a lower incidence of major complications than did lower-volume operators, but the difference was not consistent for all operators. If these data are validated, their implications for hospital, physician, and payer policy will require exploration.

[1]  H. Hecht,et al.  Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Pichard,et al.  Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by multiple, relatively low frequency operators: 1986-1987 experience. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  E J Topol,et al.  Readiness for the scorecard era in cardiovascular medicine. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  B. Rutherford,et al.  Outcome following emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed elective balloon coronary angioplasty in patients with prior coronary bypass. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  E J Topol,et al.  Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. , 1996, Circulation.

[6]  Thomas J. Ryan,et al.  Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) , 1993, Circulation.

[7]  E. Jones,et al.  Failed elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. In-hospital and late clinical outcome at 5 years. , 1990, Circulation.

[8]  Gail Gong Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression , 1986 .

[9]  G. Stone,et al.  Operator and institutional volume do not affect the procedural outcome of primary angioplasty therapy , 1996 .

[10]  E L Hannan,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. Risk factors and outcomes. , 1992, JAMA.

[11]  E. Topol,et al.  Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty? Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study (MAPS) Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  D. Pryor,et al.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[14]  E. Topol,et al.  Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology. From a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures. , 1996, Circulation.

[15]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The use and abuse of practice profiles. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[17]  H. Luft,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty Statewide Experience in California , 1993, Circulation.

[18]  Harold S. Luft,et al.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery —scheduled vs nonscheduled operations , 1987, JAMA.

[19]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The Relationship Between Inhospital Mortality Rate and Surgical Volume After Controlling For Clinical Risk Factors , 1991, Medical care.