Improving land cover classification using input variables derived from a geographically weighted principal components analysis

This study demonstrates the use of a geographically weighted principal components analysis (GWPCA) of remote sensing imagery to improve land cover classification accuracy. A principal components analysis (PCA) is commonly applied in remote sensing but generates global, spatially-invariant results. GWPCA is a local adaptation of PCA that locally transforms the image data, and in doing so, can describe spatial change in the structure of the multi-band imagery, thus directly reflecting that many landscape processes are spatially heterogenic. In this research the GWPCA localised loadings of MODIS data are used as textural inputs, along with GWPCA localised ranked scores and the image bands themselves to three supervised classification algorithms. Using a reference data set for land cover to the west of Jakarta, Indonesia the classification procedure was assessed via training and validation data splits of 80/20, repeated 100 times. For each classification algorithm, the inclusion of the GWPCA loadings data was found to significantly improve classification accuracy. Further, but more moderate improvements in accuracy were found by additionally including GWPCA ranked scores as textural inputs, data that provide information on spatial anomalies in the imagery. The critical importance of considering both spatial structure and spatial anomalies of the imagery in the classification is discussed, together with the transferability of the new method to other studies. Research topics for method refinement are also suggested.

[1]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Assessing spatial variability in soil characteristics with geographically weighted principal components analysis , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[2]  L. Eklundh,et al.  A Comparative analysis of standardised and unstandardised Principal Component Analysis in remote sensing , 1993 .

[3]  Steven Farber,et al.  A Simulation-Based Study of Geographically Weighted Regression as a Method for Investigating Spatially Varying Relationships , 2011 .

[4]  S. Myint,et al.  Fractal approaches in texture analysis and classification of remotely sensed data: Comparisons with spatial autocorrelation techniques and simple descriptive statistics , 2003 .

[5]  Pavel Propastin,et al.  Modifying geographically weighted regression for estimating aboveground biomass in tropical rainforests by multispectral remote sensing data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[7]  R. Lunetta,et al.  Remote sensing and Geographic Information System data integration: error sources and research issues , 1991 .

[8]  Thierry Toutin,et al.  Review article: Geometric processing of remote sensing images: models, algorithms and methods , 2004 .

[9]  C. Woodcock,et al.  An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal landsat TM data , 1996 .

[10]  R. Lasaponara On the use of principal component analysis (PCA) for evaluating interannual vegetation anomalies from SPOT/VEGETATION NDVI temporal series , 2006 .

[11]  John A. Richards,et al.  Thematic mapping from multitemporal image data using the principal components transformation , 1984 .

[12]  John Tenhunen,et al.  Application of a geographically‐weighted regression analysis to estimate net primary production of Chinese forest ecosystems , 2005 .

[13]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[14]  S. Ingebritsen,et al.  Principal components analysis of multitemporal image pairs , 1985 .

[15]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Geographically weighted methods and their use in network re-designs for environmental monitoring , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[16]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  A new approach for the morphological segmentation of high-resolution satellite imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Nikos Koutsias,et al.  A forward/backward principal component analysis of Landsat-7 ETM+ data to enhance the spectral signal of burnt surfaces , 2009 .

[18]  Christopher D. Lloyd,et al.  Analysing population characteristics using geographically weighted principal components analysis: A case study of Northern Ireland in 2001 , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[19]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Scale and Spatial Autocorrelation From A Remote Sensing Perspective , 2007 .

[20]  Per Jönsson,et al.  TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[21]  Maria Tsakiri-Strati,et al.  Monitoring urban changes based on scale-space filtering and object-oriented classification , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[22]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Spatial analysis of remote sensing image classification accuracy , 2012 .

[23]  Fernando Pellon de Miranda,et al.  The semivariogram in comparison to the co-occurrence matrix for classification of image texture , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  P. Atkinson Spatially weighted supervised classification for remote sensing , 2004 .

[25]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships , 2002 .

[26]  Martin Charlton,et al.  GWmodel: An R Package for Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity Using Geographically Weighted Models , 2013, 1306.0413.

[27]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: A Method for Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity , 2010 .

[28]  P. Atkinson,et al.  A Geostatistically Weighted k -NN Classifier for Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2010 .

[29]  Jinsong Deng,et al.  PCA‐based land‐use change detection and analysis using multitemporal and multisensor satellite data , 2008 .

[30]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Principal Component Analysis on Spatial Data: An Overview , 2013 .

[31]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Crown closure estimation of oak savannah in a dry season with Landsat TM imagery: Comparison of various indices through correlation analysis , 2003 .

[32]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[33]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Feed-Forward Neural Networks and Multinomial Log-Linear Models , 2015 .

[34]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Enhancements to a geographically weighted principal component analysis in the context of an application to an environmental data set , 2015 .

[35]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction , 2000 .

[36]  T Jombart,et al.  Revealing cryptic spatial patterns in genetic variability by a new multivariate method , 2008, Heredity.

[37]  S. Fotheringham,et al.  Geographically weighted summary statistics — aframework for localised exploratory data analysis , 2002 .

[38]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Multivariate Spatial Outlier Detection Using Robust Geographically Weighted Methods , 2013, Mathematical Geosciences.

[39]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien , 2014 .

[40]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[41]  Masayuki Matsuoka,et al.  Land Cover Change Detection in Ulaanbaatar Using the Breaks for Additive Seasonal and Trend Method , 2013 .

[42]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Geographically weighted discriminant analysis , 2007 .

[43]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Moving window kriging with geographically weighted variograms , 2010 .

[44]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification , 2000 .

[45]  Nicholas J. Tate,et al.  A critical synthesis of remotely sensed optical image change detection techniques , 2015 .

[46]  Pingxiang Li,et al.  Terra MODIS band 5 Stripe noise detection and correction using MAP-based algorithm , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering.

[47]  Ryutaro Tateishi,et al.  Using geographically weighted variables for image classification , 2012 .

[48]  Narumasa Tsutsumida,et al.  Measures of spatio-temporal accuracy for time series land cover data , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[49]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[50]  Sarah Parks,et al.  An effective assessment protocol for continuous geospatial datasets of forest characteristics using USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data , 2010 .

[51]  Roland L. Redmond,et al.  Estimation and Mapping of Misclassification Probabilities for Thematic Land Cover Maps , 1998 .

[52]  Martin Charlton,et al.  The GWmodel R package: further topics for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models , 2013, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[53]  Alexis J. Comber Geographically weighted methods for estimating local surfaces of overall, user and producer accuracies , 2013 .

[54]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Geographically weighted principal components analysis , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[55]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Local characterization of thematic classification accuracy through spatially constrained confusion matrices , 2005 .