The main concern of this paper is how to define proper measures of multipartite entanglement for mixed quantum states. Since the structure of partial separability and multipartite entanglement is getting complicated if the number of subsystems exceeds two, one can not expect the existence of an ultimate scalar entanglement measure, which grasps even a small part of the rich hierarchical structure of multipartite entanglement, and some higher order structure characterizing that is needed. In this paper we make some steps towards this direction.
First, we reveal the lattice-theoretic structure of the partial separability classification, introduced earlier [Sz. Szalay and Z. Kokenyesi, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032341 (2012)]. It turns out that, mathematically, the structure of the entanglement classes is the up-set lattice of the structure of the different kinds of partial separability, which is the down-set lattice of the lattice of the partitions of the subsystems. It turns also out that, physically, this structure is related to the LOCC convertibility: If a state from a class can be mapped into another one, then that class can be found higher in the hierarchy.
Second, we introduce the notion of multipartite monotonicity, expressing that a given set of entanglement monotones, while measuring the different kinds of entanglement, shows also the same hierarchical structure as the entanglement classes. Then we construct such hierarchies of entanglement measures, and propose a physically well-motivated one, being the direct multipartite generalization of the entanglement of formation based on the entanglement entropy, motivated by the notion of statistical distinguishability. The multipartite monotonicity shown by this set of measures motivates us to consider the measures to be the different manifestations of some "unified" notion of entanglement.
[1]
J. Cirac,et al.
Classification of multiqubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties
,
1999,
quant-ph/9911044.
[2]
Charalambos A. Charalambides,et al.
Enumerative combinatorics
,
2018,
SIGA.
[3]
Thomas M. Cover,et al.
Elements of Information Theory
,
2005
.
[4]
M. Huber,et al.
Multipartite entanglement measure for all discrete systems
,
2007,
0712.0346.
[5]
Thierry Paul,et al.
Quantum computation and quantum information
,
2007,
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.
[6]
G. Paz-Silva,et al.
On multipartite entanglement measures
,
2006
.
[7]
R. Radner.
PROCEEDINGS of the FOURTH BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY
,
2005
.
[8]
J. Uffink,et al.
Partial separability and entanglement criteria for multiqubit quantum states
,
2007,
0710.5326.
[9]
Szilárd Szalay.
Partial separability revisited II: Multipartite entanglement measures
,
2015
.
[10]
Robert König,et al.
Quantum entropy and its use
,
2017
.
[11]
N. J. A. Sloane,et al.
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
,
2003,
Electron. J. Comb..
[12]
Szilard Szalay,et al.
Partial separability revisited: Necessary and sufficient criteria
,
2012,
1206.6253.
[13]
Daniel Ueltschi,et al.
Entropy and the Quantum
,
2010
.
[14]
B. M. Fulk.
MATH
,
1992
.
[15]
Brian A. Davey,et al.
An Introduction to Lattices and Order
,
1989
.
[16]
B. C. Hiesmayr,et al.
Simplex of bound entangled multipartite qubit states
,
2008
.