Three-Dimensional Printing of Scaffolds with Synergistic Effects of Micro-Nano Surfaces and Hollow Channels for Bone Regeneration.

The 3D printing technology with unique strategies for accurate fabrication of biomaterials in regenerative medicine has been widely applied in bone regeneration. However, the traditional 3D printing scaffolds are only stacked by solid struts without any hollow channel structures, which limits the new bone tissue formation. In this study, a special 3D scaffold with hollow channels and a micro-nano surface was prepared by a modified 3D printing strategy combined with the hydrothermal treatment approach. By regulating the reaction solution of hydrothermal treatment, the micro-nano structures formed on the surface of scaffolds can be successfully controlled. Moreover, the scaffolds have the ability to facilitate the attachment and proliferation of BMSCs after culturing for 1, 3, and 7 days in vitro. Interestingly, the in vivo results demonstrated that the hollow channels and the micro-nano surface present synergistic effects on bone regeneration. They both boost the new bone formation in femur defects in rabbits for 12 weeks after operation. The study demonstrates a 3D scaffold with special surface microstructures and hollow struts that can overcome the shortages of most traditional scaffolds and meanwhile improve the bioactivity of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.

[1]  Dong Zhai,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Hollow-Struts-Packed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[2]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[3]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[4]  M. Yoshimura,et al.  An Effective Morphology Control of Hydroxyapatite Crystals via Hydrothermal Synthesis , 2009 .

[5]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Solvothermal preparation of hydroxyapatite microtubes in water/N,N-dimethylformamide mixed solvents , 2008 .

[6]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. , 2010, Macromolecular bioscience.

[7]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  In vitro assessment of three-dimensionally plotted nagelschmidtite bioceramic scaffolds with varied macropore morphologies. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  C J Damien,et al.  Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications. , 1991, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[9]  M. Stevens,et al.  Exploring cellular behaviour with multi-walled carbon nanotube constructs , 2007 .

[10]  A. Lynn,et al.  A novel method for the simultaneous, titrant-free control of pH and calcium phosphate mass yield. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[11]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Shigui Yan,et al.  Three-dimensional printing akermanite porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone defect repair: An investigation of osteogenic capability and mechanical evolution , 2016, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[13]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[14]  David J Mooney,et al.  Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. , 2006, Macromolecular bioscience.

[15]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing , 2013 .

[16]  Guanglong Li,et al.  Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[17]  G. Zimmermann,et al.  Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. , 2011, Injury.

[18]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  A novel bioactive porous bredigite (Ca7MgSi4O16) scaffold with biomimetic apatite layer for bone tissue engineering , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[20]  R. Müller,et al.  Bone substitute: transforming beta-tricalcium phosphate porous scaffolds into monetite. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[21]  C. Turner,et al.  Hydroxyapatite whiskers provide improved mechanical properties in reinforced polymer composites. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  Jeroen Rouwkema,et al.  Vascularization in tissue engineering. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  Lindsay S. Wray,et al.  Arrayed Hollow Channels in Silk‐Based Scaffolds Provide Functional Outcomes for Engineering Critically Sized Tissue Constructs , 2014, Advanced functional materials.

[24]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Hydrothermal microemulsion synthesis of stoichiometric single crystal hydroxyapatite nanorods with mono-dispersion and narrow-size distribution , 2007 .

[25]  Jiang Chang,et al.  A comparative study of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells on akermanite and beta-TCP ceramics. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[26]  K. Zhou,et al.  Plate-like hydroxyapatite nanoparticles synthesized by the hydrothermal method , 2009 .

[27]  Anja Lode,et al.  Alginate/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds with designed core/shell structures fabricated by 3D plotting and in situ mineralization for bone tissue engineering. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[28]  Rocky S Tuan,et al.  Three-dimensional osteogenic and chondrogenic systems to model osteochondral physiology and degenerative joint diseases , 2014, Experimental biology and medicine.

[29]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of akermanite bioceramics for bone regeneration. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[30]  Guanglong Li,et al.  3D-printed scaffolds with synergistic effect of hollow-pipe structure and bioactive ions for vascularized bone regeneration. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[31]  Jeremy J. Mao,et al.  3D printing for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside , 2015 .

[32]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  In vitro bioactivity of akermanite ceramics. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  Jiang Chang,et al.  The effect of calcium silicate on in vitro physiochemical properties and in vivo osteogenesis, degradability and bioactivity of porous β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics , 2013, Biomedical materials.

[34]  Anja Lode,et al.  Direct Plotting of Three‐Dimensional Hollow Fiber Scaffolds Based on Concentrated Alginate Pastes for Tissue Engineering , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[35]  Changwen Hu,et al.  Preparation of ultrahigh-aspect-ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers in reverse micelles under hydrothermal conditions. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[36]  Guanglong Li,et al.  3D Printing of Lotus Root‐Like Biomimetic Materials for Cell Delivery and Tissue Regeneration , 2017, Advanced science.

[37]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of angiogenesis in porous biomaterial scaffolds. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[38]  S. Hollister Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[39]  Jun Lin,et al.  Hydroxyapatite Nano- and Microcrystals with Multiform Morphologies: Controllable Synthesis and Luminescence Properties , 2009 .

[40]  F. Müller,et al.  Whisker‐Reinforced Calcium Phosphate Cements , 2007 .

[41]  J. Khinast,et al.  Chemisorption of silane compounds on hydroxyapatites of various morphologies , 2008 .