Using E-Government to Reinforce Government—Citizen Relationships

A comparison of the United States and China shows that electronic government (e-government) can be used to enhance citizens' access to government as much as government's access to citizens. Both countries are using e-government initiatives as vehicles to improve internal efficiencies and provide better services to their citizens. However, in the case of the United States, e-government also represents an opportunity to infuse business principles into the government— citizen relationship (results-oriented government). In the case of China, e-government represents a means to bring subnational levels of government under greater scrutiny and control of the central government, as it reinforces monopoly control over the government—citizen relationship (transparency with security). Further comparative analysis along three dimensions suggests that although technology can play an important role in fostering the redistribution of power and encouraging interactions between governments and citizens, the notion of government reform carries many different connotations.

[1]  Jeffrey W. Seifert,et al.  Considering E-Government from the U.S. Federal Perspective , 2004 .

[2]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  E-Government in China: A Content Analysis of National and Provincial Web Sites , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  W. Huang,et al.  E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study , 2006, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  National Computer Policy and Development in China , 1994 .

[5]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Payoffs from Investment in Information Technology: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific Region , 1994 .

[6]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[7]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  The agent-structure problem in international relations theory , 1987, International Organization.

[8]  N. Onuf,et al.  World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations , 1992 .

[9]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[10]  Taylor C. Boas,et al.  The Internet and state control in authoritarian regimes , 2001 .

[11]  G. Garson,et al.  Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices , 2003 .

[12]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule , 2003, First Monday.

[13]  Lianjie Ma,et al.  E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution , 2001, First Monday.

[15]  J. Pierre.  Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy , 2000 .

[16]  Tan Zixiang,et al.  Regulating China's Internet: convergence toward a coherent regulatory regime , 1999 .

[17]  Harold C. Relyea,et al.  A brief history of the emergence of digital government in the United States , 2004 .