Networking by Entrepreneurs: Patterns of Tie—Formation in Emerging Organizations

There are two conflicting patterns of network development of founding entrepreneurs that emerge from existing literature. One of them evolves from an identity-based network dominated by strong ties into an intentionally managed network rich in weak ties. The other involves the opposite, with weak ties dominating in the emergence phase and some of them developing into strong ties, the latter of which are characteristic of the early growth phase. The empirical part of this study focused on the development of the networks of 32 IT start-ups in The Netherlands, which we constructed on the basis of secondary data sources and in-depth interviews with the founders. We found three distinct patterns of network development. The conflicting patterns from the literature fitted two of our patterns and we were able to reconcile them by showing how initial founding conditions and post-founding entrepreneurial processes influence tie-formation processes. We propose that the simultaneous effect of these tie-formation processes leads to particular development patterns of weak and strong ties over time, highlighting the importance of investigating network processes.

[1]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[2]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix ☆ , 2006 .

[3]  W. Hulsink,et al.  Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms , 2001 .

[4]  Bat Batjargal,et al.  Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[5]  Andrea L. Larson,et al.  A Network Model of Organization Formation , 1993 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[7]  Julie M. Hite Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms , 2005 .

[8]  Ha Hoang,et al.  Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review , 2003 .

[9]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[10]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[11]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[12]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Business , 1998 .

[13]  Ragnhild Silkoset,et al.  The Dark Side of Social Capital , 2008 .

[14]  Scott Shane,et al.  Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[15]  James O. Fiet,et al.  The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery , 1996 .

[16]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  A Theory of the Early Growth of the Firm , 1998 .

[17]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[18]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[19]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[20]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[22]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[23]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[24]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Social Networks and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[25]  Sarah L. Jack The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis , 2005 .

[26]  Indre Maurer,et al.  Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups , 2006 .

[27]  Choonwoo Lee,et al.  Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance. A study on technology-based ventures , 2001 .

[28]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[29]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Research notes and communications management objectives in mergers and acquisitions , 1990 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[32]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[33]  A. Greve,et al.  Social Networks and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[34]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[35]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  Tightening the Life-Cycle Construct: A Taxonomic Study of Growth Stage Configurations in High-Technology Organizations , 1994 .

[36]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Bridge decay , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[37]  Alain Degenne Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[38]  S. Shane,et al.  Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures , 2004 .

[39]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[40]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development , 2003 .

[41]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  The Pressure of the Past: Network Imprinting in Intercorporate Communities , 2003 .

[42]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Resource Cooptation Via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures , 1990 .

[44]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[45]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[46]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[47]  Mario Benassi,et al.  The Dark Side of Social Capital , 1999 .

[48]  Julie M. Hite Patterns of Multidimensionality among Embedded Network Ties: A Typology of Relational Embeddedness in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms , 2003 .

[49]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[51]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks , 2000 .